Feasibility and early safety of hybrid coronary revascularisation combining off-pump coronary surgery through J-hemisternotomy with percutaneous coronary intervention.

AIMS To assess the procedural feasibility and early safety of hybrid coronary revascularisation, combining off-pump left internal mammary artery grafting to the left descending coronary artery (LAD) through an inferior J-hemisternotomy (JOPCAB) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-LAD lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 100 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease involving LAD were included in this prospective registry. Hybrid revascularisation was performed by JOPCAB, either prior to PCI (89%) or following PCI (11%). In 96% of the cases, the procedure was carried out according to the preoperative strategy and without perioperative (24 hours) major adverse cardiac or cerebral events. At one month, we observed no deaths, one stroke and two procedure-related myocardial infarctions. Five patients underwent reoperation for graft dysfunction, four of whom were identified by angiography without prior signs of ischaemia. Reoperation due to bleeding was necessary in six patients, and nine patients received red blood cell transfusion. CONCLUSIONS Our prospective registry documented promising procedural feasibility and early safety of coronary hybrid revascularisation combining JOPCAB with PCI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01496664.

[1]  Jeffrey L. Anderson,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2011, Circulation.

[2]  B. Seifert,et al.  Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). , 2010, European heart journal.

[4]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  John A McPherson,et al.  Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization results from a fully integrated hybrid catheterization laboratory/operating room. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  F. Mohr,et al.  Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  B. Kiaii,et al.  Simultaneous integrated coronary artery revascularization with long-term angiographic follow-up. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  J. Alpert,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[9]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007 .

[10]  Bari Investigators The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial. , 2007 .

[11]  I. Frolkis,et al.  The potential advantage of "no-touch" aortic technique in off-pump complete arterial revascularization. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[12]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Integrated coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: immediate and seven-month outcome. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  K. Alexander,et al.  Excess dosing of antiplatelet and antithrombin agents in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2005, JAMA.

[14]  Prevent Iv Investigators Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005 .

[15]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  M. Shackcloth,et al.  Left internal mammary artery use in patients with poor left ventricular ejection fraction: a propensity-matched analysis of mid-term survival. , 2005, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[17]  E. Hannan,et al.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Y. Paz,et al.  No-touch aorta off-pump coronary surgery: The effect on stroke , 2005 .

[19]  W. Boyd,et al.  Hybrid robotic coronary artery surgery and angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  A. Bochenek,et al.  Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization. , 2002, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[21]  G. O'connor,et al.  Use of the Internal Mammary Artery Graft and In-Hospital Mortality and Other Adverse Outcomes Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 2001, Circulation.

[22]  H. Drexler,et al.  Myocardial “hybrid” revascularisation with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with coronary angioplasty: preliminary results of a multicentre study , 2000, Heart.

[23]  H. Schaff,et al.  Frequency of early occlusion and stenosis in a left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery bypass graft after surgery through a median sternotomy on conventional bypass: benchmark for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. , 1999, Circulation.

[24]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[25]  B. Griffith,et al.  Alternative approach to multivessel coronary disease with integrated coronary revascularization. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[26]  J. Schofer,et al.  Beating heart operations including hybrid revascularization: initial experiences. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  Peter Wilde,et al.  Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation , 1996, The Lancet.

[28]  E J Topol,et al.  Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[29]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  B. Meyers,et al.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery , 2016 .

[31]  Janet S. Wright,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[32]  Y. Mehta,et al.  Comparison of ministernotomy with minithoracotomy regarding postoperative pain and internal mammary artery characteristics. , 2000, The heart surgery forum.

[33]  G. Brandrup-Wognsen,et al.  Difficulties in the interpretation of coronary angiogram early after coronary artery bypass surgery on the beating heart. , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[34]  S. Nashef,et al.  Eurp-pean system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro SCORE) , 1999 .