Are surface properties integrated into visuohaptic object representations?

Object recognition studies have almost exclusively involved vision, focusing on shape rather than surface properties such as color. Visual object representations are thought to integrate shape and color information because changing the color of studied objects impairs their subsequent recognition. However, little is known about integration of surface properties into visuohaptic multisensory representations. Here, participants studied objects with distinct patterns of surface properties (color in Experiment 1, texture in Experiments 2 and 3) and had to discriminate between object shapes when color or texture schemes were altered in within‐modal (visual and haptic) and cross‐modal (visual study followed by haptic test and vice versa) conditions. In Experiment 1, color changes impaired within‐modal visual recognition but had no effect on cross‐modal recognition, suggesting that the multisensory representation was not influenced by modality‐specific surface properties. In Experiment 2, texture changes impaired recognition in all conditions, suggesting that both unisensory and multisensory representations integrated modality‐independent surface properties. However, the cross‐modal impairment might have reflected either the texture change or a failure to form the multisensory representation. Experiment 3 attempted to distinguish between these possibilities by combining changes in texture with changes in orientation, taking advantage of the known view‐independence of the multisensory representation, but the results were not conclusive owing to the overwhelming effect of texture change. The simplest account is that the multisensory representation integrates shape and modality‐independent surface properties. However, more work is required to investigate this and the conditions under which multisensory integration of structural and surface properties occurs.

[1]  D. Freides,et al.  Human information processing and sensory modality: cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory, and deficit. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[3]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  M. Heller Texture perception in sighted and blind observers , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Haptic integration of object properties: texture, hardness, and planar contour. , 1989 .

[6]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic integration of object properties: texture, hardness, and planar contour. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Constraints on Haptic Integration of Spatially Shared Object Dimensions , 1993, Perception.

[9]  R. Abelson Statistics As Principled Argument , 1995 .

[10]  Michael D. Heath,et al.  Are edges sufficient for object recognition? , 1998 .

[11]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Color diagnosticity in object recognition , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  T. Hendler,et al.  Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Visual and Haptic Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[14]  T. Hendler,et al.  Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  J. Stoner,et al.  Color Vision in Alzheimer’s Patients: Can We Improve Object Recognition With Color Cues? , 2003 .

[16]  Minming Zhang,et al.  Neural networks active during tactile form perception: common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  G. Humphrey,et al.  The Effect of Colour Congruency on Shape Discriminations of Novel Objects , 2004, Perception.

[18]  John R. Votaw,et al.  Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  K. Sathian,et al.  Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Imagining material versus geometric properties of objects: an fMRI study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  S. Lacey,et al.  Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: evidence from interference effects , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Independent representation of parts and the relations between them: evidence from integrative agnosia. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published April 28, 2006 Attention to Form or Surface Properties Modulates Different Regions of Human , 2022 .

[24]  Cathrine V. Jansson-Boyd,et al.  Not only in the eye of the beholder: Tactile information can affect aesthetic evaluation. , 2007 .

[25]  S. Lacey,et al.  Cross-Modal Object Recognition Is Viewpoint-Independent , 2007, PloS one.

[26]  S. Lacey,et al.  Vision and Touch: Multiple or Multisensory Representations of Objects? , 2007, Perception.

[27]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Independent Processing of Form, Colour, and Texture in Object Perception , 2008, Perception.

[28]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Randall Stilla,et al.  Selective visuo‐haptic processing of shape and texture , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  Vision and touch: Independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture? , 2008, Brain Research.

[31]  David J. Therriault,et al.  The role of color diagnosticity in object recognition and representation , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[32]  S. Lacey,et al.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Eric J. L. Egan,et al.  Perceptual equivalence between vision and touch is complexity dependent. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[34]  S. Lacey,et al.  Use of complex three-dimensional objects to assess visuospatial memory in healthy individuals and patients with unilateral amygdalohippocampectomy , 2010, Epilepsy & Behavior.