Wearable Dual-Frequency Vibrotactile System for Restoring Force and Stiffness Perception

Recently, there has been substantial progress in the mechatronic design and myoelectric control of active prostheses. However, a significant unmet need is the lack of sensory feedback in commercial prostheses for upper-limb amputees. The lack of sensory perception impacts on the control performance and embodiment, determining relatively high rejection rates. Previous research has been conducted to evaluate various non-invasive substitutional sensory channels, mainly to regenerate haptic perception. However, providing sensory channels for stiffness perception has been much less explored. In this short paper, we propose a non-invasive wearable sensory armband, named vibrotactile frequency modulation (V-FM) system. Using the V-FM, we implement a closed-loop myocontrol system with force and stiffness perception. A user study was conducted based on a repetitive two-forced alternative choice discrimination test in six able-bodied participants. The study was designed according to the method of constant stimuli. Results showed that using the V-FM armband, the participants recovered sensation comparable (in terms of difference threshold) to the natural stiffness perception. This demonstrated the potential of the proposed V-FM armband in restoring haptic and stiffness perception non-invasively.

[1]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[2]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Stiffness Feedback for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses Using Vibrotactile Stimulation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  I. Carlsson,et al.  Forearm amputees' views of prosthesis use and sensory feedback. , 2015, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[5]  M. A. Srinivassan The impact of visual information on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments , 1996 .

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  Multichannel electrotactile feedback for simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  A.M. Okamura,et al.  Effects of Visual and Proprioceptive Motion Feedback on Human Control of Targeted Movement , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[8]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Perception of force and stiffness in the presence of low-frequency haptic noise , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Cara E. Stepp,et al.  Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution for Electromyographic Control of Object Manipulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  C Ghez,et al.  Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[12]  Ingo Fründ,et al.  Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[13]  C. Antfolk,et al.  Artificial Redirection of Sensation From Prosthetic Fingers to the Phantom Hand Map on Transradial Amputees: Vibrotactile Versus Mechanotactile Sensory Feedback , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Vibrotactile sensory substitution in multi-fingered hand prostheses: Evaluation studies , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[15]  Peter H Veltink,et al.  Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users , 2015, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[16]  Claudio Pacchierotti,et al.  Two Finger Grasping Simulation with Cutaneous and Kinesthetic Force Feedback , 2012, EuroHaptics.

[17]  M A Srinivasan,et al.  Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Perception of Springs With Visual and Proprioceptive Motion Cues: Implications for Prosthetics , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[19]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Stiffness discrimination with visual and proprioceptive cues , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[20]  Domenico Prattichizzo,et al.  Simplified design of haptic display by extending one-point kinesthetic feedback to multipoint tactile feedback , 2010, 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium.

[21]  Peter B. Shull,et al.  Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  HyVE—Hybrid Vibro-Electrotactile Stimulation—Is an Efficient Approach to Multi-Channel Sensory Feedback , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[24]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics , 2013, Expert review of medical devices.

[25]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Skin Stretch Haptic Feedback to Convey Closure Information in Anthropomorphic, Under-Actuated Upper Limb Soft Prostheses , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[26]  Massimiliano Di Luca Multisensory Softness: Perceived Compliance from Multiple Sources of Information , 2014 .

[27]  Ali Israr,et al.  Multi-Sensory Stimuli Improve Distinguishability of Cutaneous Haptic Cues , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[28]  Seungmoon Choi,et al.  Vibrotactile Display: Perception, Technology, and Applications , 2013, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.