Risk management and contingency sum of construction projects

Purpose Most organisations do not have established guidelines for the estimation and management of contingency funds. The purpose of this paper is to identify the risk factors at the construction phase causing project cost overruns, and a reliable method for the estimation of contingency sum is established. Design/methodology/approach Combined qualitative–quantitative exploratory methods were used. Qualitative interviews were conducted with five expert practitioners working in a Public Works Department in Zambia to determine how contingency sum is estimated and to explore what risk factors should be considered. Quantitative regression used cost and risk data collected from 30 recently completed building and refurbishment projects. Findings The qualitative study indicated that the project budget overruns constitute a major issue. This finding is in line with the paired-samples t-test results which show that the difference between the total variations and the initial contingency sum tends to be significant. The regression analysis proved that the contingency sum was positively correlated to the estimated contract sum. The qualitative interview results and Pearson correlation analysis also showed that contingency sum and project complexity tend to have a significant correlation. The research also demonstrates that the type of works is not a direct significant factor. Research limitations/implications Because the projects used for the study were relatively short, duration of the project and economic factor of tax rate, exchange rate and inflation rate were not examined in the multiple regression analysis. Further studies should be conducted on longer projects to test out whether these risk factors are significant in influencing the project contingency. Practical implications The results demonstrate that the multiple regression method can be applied as a reliable tool to predict contingency sums. Accurate contingency sums and project budget estimates benefit construction clients and their project managers. Individual project conditions should be carefully examined when assessing the contingency. Originality/value This research establishes a reliable regression method for the assessment of the contingency for the pre-tender estimate which has significant impact on the project feasibility and cost control, using related risk factors involved in construction contingency and client’s contingency.

[2]  E. Kutsch,et al.  Deliberate ignorance in project risk management , 2010 .

[3]  Abera Joseph John Clinton.  Factors influencing the final cost of construction projects in Ghana , 2015 .

[4]  Ismail Abdul Rahman,et al.  Factors affecting construction cost performance in project management projects: Case of MARA large projects , 2014 .

[5]  Chau Kwong Wing,et al.  The baby and the bathwater: research methods in construction management , 1998 .

[6]  Richard Levin,et al.  Statistics for Management. , 1979 .

[7]  Gary Jackson.  Contingency for Cost Control in Project Management: A Case Study , 2003 .

[8]  David Arditi,et al.  Budgeting Owner's Construction Contingency , 2007 .

[9]  David Baccarini.  The maturing concept of estimating project cost contingency: A review , 2006 .

[10]  Sung Hoon An,et al.  Comparison of construction cost estimating models based on regression analysis, neural networks, and case-based reasoning , 2004 .

[11]  David Baccarini.  Estimating project cost continency - a model and exploration of research questions , 2004 .

[12]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  Managing geotechnical risk on us design-build transport projects , 2014 .

[13]  Arazi Idrus,et al.  Development of project cost contingency estimation model using risk analysis and fuzzy expert system , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Joseph A. Demkin.  Security planning and design : a guide for architects and building design professionals , 2004 .

[15]  Ahmed Doko Ibrahim,et al.  Modelling building construction durations , 2015 .

[16]  John Raftery,et al.  Breaking up methodological monopolies: a multi-paradigm approach to construction management research , 1997 .

[17]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[18]  Ammar Peter Kaka,et al.  Regression modelling of risk impacts on construction cost flow forecast , 2012 .

[19]  Honorius Makombo Makombo.  The risk management framework for organisations dealing with construction project management in South Africa , 2012 .

[20]  Aayushi Gupta,et al.  Exploring Risk Dimensions in the Indian Software Industry , 2011 .

[21]  Ali Touran.  Calculation of contingency in construction projects , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[22]  David Baccarini.  Understanding project cost contingency: A survey , 2005 .

[23]  W. Duncan.  A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[24]  Roger Flanagan,et al.  Risk Management and Construction , 1993 .

[25]  Dominic D. Ahiaga-Dagbui,et al.  Rethinking Construction Cost Overruns: Cognition, Learning and Estimation , 2014 .

[26]  Ibrahim Mahamid,et al.  Early cost estimating for road construction projects using multiple regression techniques , 2011 .

[27]  Hemanta Doloi,et al.  Understanding impacts of time and cost related construction risks on operational performance of PPP projects , 2012 .

[28]  Alfred E. Thal,et al.  Estimation of Cost Contingency for Air Force Construction Projects , 2010 .

[29]  Terence Lam,et al.  A Risk Management Approach for Prediction of Contingency Sum for Public-Sector Construction Projects , 2017 .

[30]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  A methodology for project control through risk analysis: the case of a pipeline project , 1993, Proceedings of Engineering Management Society Conference on Managing Projects in a Borderless World.