On the non-Darcian seepage flow field around a deeply buried tunnel after excavation

When a tunnel is excavated in a water-bearing rock mass, groundwater may flow toward the tunnel and cause some adverse effects. Although the non-Darcian hydraulic characteristics of fractured rock masses have been extensively studied by laboratory and field tests, the non-Darcian seepage flow was seldom taken into account in engineering practice so far. This paper investigates the non-Darcian seepage flow around a deeply buried tunnel after excavation. In-situ water injection tests were conducted to investigate the hydraulic characteristics of the rock mass, and a formula was derived to quantify the non-linear hydraulic conductivity from the test data. A numerical method based on non-linear finite element method was then proposed to simulate the non-Darcian seepage flow toward the tunnel. By comparing the numerical results of non-Darcian seepage flow with the results based on a traditional Darcian assumption, it is found that the difference of hydraulic head distribution is slight, but the difference of flow velocity and total discharge is obvious. The Darcian assumption provides rational discharge estimation only when the actual flow velocity around the tunnel is similar to the flow velocity in in-situ tests; however, the non-Darcian assumption is able to obtain a more rational result especially when the number of test pressure steps used in in-situ tests is limited.

[1]  L. Xue,et al.  Algorithm of Coupled Normal Stress and Fluid Flow in Fractured Rock Mass by the Composite Element Method , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[2]  H. Jourde,et al.  Relationship between the geometrical and structural properties of layered fractured rocks and their effective permeability tensor. A simulation study , 2007 .

[3]  Guan Rong,et al.  Flow–stress coupled permeability tensor for fractured rock masses , 2008 .

[4]  M. Zoorabadi,et al.  A new equation for the equivalent hydraulic conductivity of rock mass around a tunnel , 2012 .

[5]  P. Ranjith,et al.  Laboratory Simulation of Flow through Single Fractured Granite , 2015, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[6]  A. Hoch,et al.  Self‐consistency of a heterogeneous continuum porous medium representation of a fractured medium , 2000 .

[7]  Qian-qing Zhang,et al.  Analysis and Construction Techniques for a Water Seal for Underground Mines Subjected to Water Inrush , 2016, Mine Water and the Environment.

[8]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Mechanism of water inrush and quicksand movement induced by a borehole and measures for prevention and remediation , 2015, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[9]  Hadi Farhadian,et al.  Empirical model for estimating groundwater flow into tunnel in discontinuous rock masses , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[10]  Mostafa Sharifzadeh,et al.  Evaluation of high local groundwater inflow to a rock tunnel by characterization of geological features , 2011 .

[11]  Hadi Farhadian,et al.  Numerical analysis of steady-state groundwater inflow into Tabriz line 2 metro tunnel, northwestern Iran, with special consideration of model dimensions , 2016, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

[12]  Zhenyu Zhang,et al.  Fluid flow regimes and nonlinear flow characteristics in deformable rock fractures , 2013 .

[13]  Marco Bittelli.  Conceptual Models of Flow and Transport in the Fractured Vadose Zone. , 2002 .

[14]  C. Cherubini,et al.  Bench scale laboratory tests to analyze non-linear flow in fractured media , 2012 .

[15]  Seung Hyun Lee,et al.  Assessment of the validity of Stokes and Reynolds equations for fluid flow through a rough‐walled fracture with flow imaging , 2014 .

[16]  Cuiying Zhou,et al.  A pore-scale numerical model for non-Darcy fluid flow through rough-walled fractures , 2017 .

[17]  Yi‐Feng Chen,et al.  Non-Darcy's law-based analytical models for data interpretation of high-pressure packer tests in fractured rocks , 2015 .

[18]  Chuangbing Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of Groundwater Leakage into a Drainage Tunnel in Jinping-I Arch Dam Foundation in Southwestern China: A Case Study , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[20]  Cccc Tunnel.  Analytical solutions for water inflow into an underwater tunnel and its application , 2009 .

[21]  Pengjiao Jia,et al.  Seepage–stress coupled analysis on anisotropic characteristics of the fractured rock mass around roadway , 2014 .

[22]  Joon-Shik Moon,et al.  Effect of highly pervious geological features on ground-water flow into a tunnel , 2011 .

[23]  Joon-Shik Moon,et al.  Excavation-induced hydraulic conductivity reduction around a tunnel – Part 1: Guideline for estimate of ground water inflow rate , 2010 .

[24]  Shervin Motamedi,et al.  Application of extreme learning machine for prediction of aqueous solubility of carbon dioxide , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[25]  Leland K. Wenzel,et al.  The thiem method for determining permeability of water-bearing materials and its application to the determination of specific yield; results of investigations in the Platte river valley, Nebraska , 1935 .

[26]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Anisotropies in Mechanical Behaviour, Thermal Expansion and P-Wave Velocity of Sandstone with Bedding Planes , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[27]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Influence of structure and water pressure on the hydraulic conductivity of the rock mass around underground excavations , 2016 .

[28]  M. F. Lough,et al.  Hierarchical modeling of flow in naturally fractured formations with multiple length scales , 2001 .

[29]  M. Oda,et al.  Permeability tensor for discontinuous rock masses , 1985 .

[30]  Massimo Coli,et al.  Tunnelling and Hydrogeological Issues: A Short Review of the Current State of the Art , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[31]  John A. Cherry,et al.  Quantification of non‐Darcian flow observed during packer testing in fractured sedimentary rock , 2011 .

[32]  D. T. Snow,et al.  Anisotropie Permeability of Fractured Media , 1969 .

[33]  Cuiying Zhou,et al.  Modeling Free-Surface Seepage Flow in Complicated Fractured Rock Mass Using a Coupled RPIM-FEM Method , 2017, Transport in Porous Media.

[34]  O. Kolditz.  Non‐linear flow in fractured rock , 2001 .

[35]  M. Sharifzadeh,et al.  Critical Reynolds number for nonlinear flow through rough‐walled fractures: The role of shear processes , 2014 .

[36]  Joon-Shik Moon,et al.  Excavation-induced hydraulic conductivity reduction around a tunnel – Part 2: Verification of proposed method using numerical modeling , 2010 .

[37]  Hung I. Lin,et al.  Application of fracture network model with crack permeability tensor on flow and transport in fractured rock , 2010 .

[38]  Kyung-Ho Park,et al.  Analytical solution for steady-state groundwater inflow into a drained circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer: A revisit , 2008 .

[39]  N. Coli,et al.  Evaluation of rock-mass permeability tensor and prediction of tunnel inflows by means of geostructural surveys and finite element seepage analysis , 2008 .

[40]  Shuqi Ma,et al.  Micro- and macro-behaviour of fluid flow through rock fractures: an experimental study , 2013, Hydrogeology Journal.

[41]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Experimental study of the transition from non-Darcian to Darcy behavior for flow through a single fracture , 2015 .

[43]  Yi‐Feng Chen,et al.  Estimating hydraulic conductivity of fractured rocks from high‐pressure packer tests with an Izbash's law‐based empirical model , 2015 .

[44]  Ming Xiao,et al.  Study on coupled seepage and stress fields in the concrete lining of the underground pipe with high water pressure , 2009 .