Development of high quantum efficiency flat panel detectors for portal imaging: intrinsic spatial resolution.

Recently developed flat panel detectors have been proven to have a much better image quality than conventional electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). They are, however, not yet the ideal systems for portal imaging application due to the low x-ray absorption, i.e., low quantum efficiency (QE), which is typically on the order of 2-4% as compared to the theoretical limit of 100%. The QE of current flat panel systems can be improved by significantly increasing the thickness of the energy conversion layer (i.e., amorphous selenium or phosphor screen). This, however, will be at the expense of a decrease in spatial resolution mainly due to x-ray scatter in the conversion layer (and also the spread of optical photons in the case of phosphor screen). In this paper, we investigate theoretically the intrinsic spatial resolution of a high QE flat panel detector with a new energy conversion layer that is much denser and thicker than that of current flat panel systems. The modulation transfer function (MTF) of the system is calculated based on a theoretical model using a novel approach, which uses an analytical expression for absorbed dose. It is found that if appropriate materials are used for the conversion layer, then the intrinsic MTF of the high QE flat panel is better than that of current EPIDs, and in addition they have a high QE (e.g., approximately 60%). Some general rules for the design of the conversion layer to achieve both high QE and high resolution as well as high DQE are also discussed.

[1]  S. Webb,et al.  Rapid portal imaging with a high-efficiency, large field-of-view detector. , 1998, Medical physics.

[2]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Development of thin-film flat-panel arrays for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[3]  K. Peck,et al.  Reconstruction of 6 MV photon spectra from measured transmission including maximum energy estimation. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J. Rowlands,et al.  Investigation of a direct conversion flat panel imager for portal imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[5]  P. Munro,et al.  X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays. , 1998, Medical physics.

[6]  Jean-Louis Gerstenmayer.  Improving spatial resolution of high stopping power X- and gamma-ray cameras:. fibers or slat-structured detectors? , 2000 .

[7]  B G Fallone,et al.  Monte Carlo detective quantum efficiency and scatter studies of a metal/a-Se portal detector. , 1998, Medical physics.

[8]  E. Mok,et al.  A photon dose distribution model employing convolution calculations. , 1985, Medical physics.

[9]  P. Munro,et al.  A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). , 1992, Medical physics.

[10]  O Sauer,et al.  Reconstruction of high-energy bremsstrahlung spectra by numerical analysis of depth-dose data. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Kanai S. Shah,et al.  Comparative study of Pbl2 and Hgl2 as direct detector materials for high-resolution x-ray image sensors , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  B. Fallone,et al.  Detective quantum efficiency of a direct-detection active matrix flat panel imager at megavoltage energies. , 2001, Medical physics.