The effect of noun phrase length on the form of referring expressions
暂无分享,去创建一个
Fernanda Ferreira | Martin J Pickering | Kumiko Fukumura | M. Pickering | F. Ferreira | Kumiko Fukumura | Hossein Karimi | Hossein Karimi
[1] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .
[2] R. Baayen,et al. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .
[3] Carl Pollard,et al. A Centering Approach to Pronouns , 1987, ACL.
[4] F. Craik,et al. Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .
[5] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .
[6] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .
[7] M. Pickering,et al. Planning causes and consequences in discourse , 2005 .
[8] Michael Hammond,et al. Studies in Syntactic Typology , 1988 .
[9] T. Givon. Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .
[10] Kumiko Fukumura,et al. The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression , 2011 .
[11] Edith A. Moravcsik,et al. Universals of human language , 1978 .
[12] Philip Hofmeister,et al. Representational complexity and memory retrieval in language comprehension , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.
[13] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Coherence and Coreference Revisited , 2007, J. Semant..
[14] Martin J Pickering,et al. The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[15] A. Almor,et al. Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.
[16] G. Zipf,et al. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. , 1949 .
[17] F. Keil. Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 2014 .
[18] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[19] Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al. Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .
[20] G. Peeters,et al. Implicit causality in verbs: The role of cognitive programs , 2011 .
[21] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes , 2008 .
[22] Mira Ariel,et al. Referring expressions and the +/- coreference distinction , 1996 .
[23] Scott Weinstein,et al. Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Coherence of Discourse , 1994 .
[24] S. Brennan. Centering Attention in Discourse. , 1995 .
[25] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[26] Jeanette K. Gundel,et al. Reference and Referent Accessibility , 1996 .
[27] P. O'Seaghdha,et al. Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift , 1998 .
[28] T. Florian Jaeger,et al. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[29] Scott Weinstein,et al. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.
[30] Mira Ariel. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .
[31] J. Oberlander,et al. Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations , 2000 .
[32] F. Ferreira,et al. Language processing in the visual world: Effects of preview, visual complexity, and prediction , 2013 .
[33] Barbara J. Grosz,et al. Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..
[34] C. Clifton,et al. Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading , 2008, Memory & cognition.
[35] J. Hyönä,et al. Gender affects semantic competition: the effect of gender in a non-gender-marking language. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[36] John A. Hawkins,et al. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .
[37] J. K. Bock,et al. Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.
[38] Kathryn Bock,et al. Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .
[39] T. Givón. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .
[40] G. Dell,et al. Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[41] Fernanda Ferreira,et al. The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[42] T. Givon. The pragmatics of word order , 1988 .
[43] Franklin Chang,et al. Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English , 2009 .
[44] Jeanette K. Gundel,et al. Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993, The Oxford Handbook of Reference.
[45] M. Halliday. NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .
[46] R. Freedle. Discourse production and comprehension , 1978 .
[47] T. Givon. Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics , 1989 .
[48] Richard L. Lewis,et al. An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[49] William Marks. Retrieval constraints on associative elaborations. , 1987 .
[50] A. Sanford,et al. Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[51] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. How does similarity-based interference affect the choice of referring expression? , 2011 .
[52] C. Fletcher. Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing , 1984 .
[53] Karl G. D. Bailey,et al. Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .
[54] Robert L. Goldstone. Returning to a New Home , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[55] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .
[56] T. Jaeger,et al. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[57] Charles E. Caton,et al. Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective , 1982 .
[58] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. Choosing anaphoric expressions : do people take into account likelihood of reference? , 2010 .
[59] F. Chang. Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production , 2002 .
[60] F. Craik,et al. The effects of elaboration on recognition memory , 1980, Memory & cognition.
[61] Maryellen C MacDonald,et al. It’s not Just the “Heavy NP”: Relative Phrase Length Modulates the Production of Heavy-NP Shift , 2011, Journal of psycholinguistic research.