Effectiveness of Organizational Responses to Technological Change in the Production Process

This paper examines the effectiveness of organizational problem solving in response to technological change in the production process. First, the paper measures the degree of uncertainty associated with a given technological change by examining (1) the novelty of specific new features and functions, and (2) the required departure from established operating assumptions and organizational relationships. Second, the paper identifies three modes of problem solving that organizations use in dealing with technological change: modification prior to implementation (preparatory search), joint work with external technical experts during production start-up (joint search), and integration of engineering and manufacturing functions engaged in start-up (functional overlap). The effectiveness of these approaches is then tested on a sample of 48 new process introductions undertaken in eight plants by a leading global producer of precision metal components. Results indicate that the measured characteristics of technological change are significant predictors of the difficulties encountered in introducing new process technology. Findings also suggest that intensive problem solving efforts can significantly improve change outcomes, both shortening the period of disruption experienced and increasing the operating gains achieved. In addition, there was some evidence that the three organizational problem solving activities discussed here are not equally effective for responding to all types of process change. Specifically, the higher the level of technical novelty involved, the less useful was overlap between engineering and manufacturing functions. This challenges the general prescription that cross-functional team involvement in major technical projects always should be maximized, regardless of the nature of the change involved.

[1]  D. Gerwin,et al.  Control and evaluation in the innovation process: The case of flexible manufacturing systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[3]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[4]  Stephen I. Cohen,et al.  Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. , 1969 .

[5]  D. Gerwin,et al.  A theory of innovation processes for computer-aided manufacturing technology , 1988 .

[6]  C. A. Voss,et al.  Implementation: A key issue in manufacturing technology: The need for a field of study , 1988 .

[7]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[8]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[9]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[10]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[11]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[12]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[13]  R. Osborn,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Design. Vol. 1: Adapting Organizations to Their Environments. , 1982 .

[14]  K. Clark Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[15]  W. Nord,et al.  Implementing Routine and Radical Inno-vation , 1986 .

[16]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[17]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[18]  Donald G. Marquis,et al.  Successful industrial innovations : a study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms , 1969 .

[19]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[20]  M. Landau Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap , 1969 .

[21]  Jr. Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Softw , 1978 .

[22]  James Rieser Bright,et al.  Automation and Management , 1956, Nature.

[23]  Russell Wayne Radford The impact of management on the introduction of process technology in a process-oriented firm , 1986 .

[24]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[25]  J. Hage,et al.  Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation. , 1982 .

[26]  J. Pennings,et al.  The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry , 1992 .

[27]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[28]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[29]  William M. Evan,et al.  Toward a Theory of Inter-Organizational Relations , 1965 .

[30]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations: Limits and Opportunities for Management Strategies. , 1988 .

[31]  R. Normann,et al.  Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation , 1971 .

[32]  E. Hufnagel Managing Complexity in High Technology Organizations , 1990 .

[33]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[34]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[35]  N. Venkatraman The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards Verbal and Statistical Congruence. , 1987 .

[36]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[37]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  R&D performance as a function of internal communication, project management, and the nature of the work , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[38]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[39]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[40]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Implementing Internal Diversification: Contingency Factors for Organization Design Choices , 1987 .

[41]  J. Ettlie Manpower Flows and the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[42]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[43]  J. Thompson,et al.  Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decision , 1959 .

[44]  L. Pondy,et al.  The management of organization design , 1976 .

[45]  C. Morris Task effects on group interaction. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Conceptual issues in the study of innovation , 1976 .

[47]  M. Tushman Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[48]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[49]  Harvey M. Sapolsky,et al.  Organizational Structure and Innovation , 1967 .

[50]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[51]  Andre L. Delbecq,et al.  The Management of Decision-Making Within the Firm: Three Strategies for Three Types of Decision-Making* , 1967 .

[52]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PRODUCTION INNOVATION , 1980 .

[53]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .