Socially Embodied Human-Robot Interaction: Addressing Human Emotions with Theories of Embodied Cognition

A fundamental challenge of human interaction with socially interactive robots, compared to other interactive products, comes from them being embodied. The embodied nature of social robots questions to what degree humans can interact ‘naturally' with robots, and what impact the interaction quality has on the user experience (UX). UX is fundamentally about emotions that arise and form in humans through the use of technology in a particular situation. This chapter aims to contribute to the field of human-robot interaction (HRI) by addressing, in further detail, the role and relevance of embodied cognition for human social interaction, and consequently what role embodiment can play in HRI, especially for socially interactive robots. Furthermore, some challenges for socially embodied interaction between humans and socially interactive robots are outlined and possible directions for future research are presented. It is concluded that the body is of crucial importance in understanding emotion and cognition in general, and, in particular, for a positive user experience to emerge when interacting with socially interactive robots.

[1]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons , 2002, Science.

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  International Journal of Robotics Applications and Technologies , .

[5]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  On the Role of Emotion in Embodied Cognitive Architectures: From Organisms to Robots , 2009, Cognitive Computation.

[6]  A. Clark.  An embodied cognitive science? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Similarity-Dissimilarity Competition in Disjunctive Classification Tasks , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[9]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Epilogue: Where the action was, wasn't, should have been, and might yet be , 2013, TCHI.

[11]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Natural user interfaces are not natural , 2010, INTR.

[13]  Timo Partala,et al.  Understanding the most satisfying and unsatisfying user experiences: Emotions, psychological needs, and context , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[14]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Social Situatedness of Natural and Artificial Intelligence: Vygotsky and Beyond , 2003, Adapt. Behav..

[15]  Sebastian Thrun.  Toward a framework for human-robot interaction , 2004 .

[16]  J. Lindblom.  Embodied Social Cognition , 2015 .

[17]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field , 2007 .

[18]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Jakob Heinzle,et al.  Flow of affective information between communicating brains , 2011, NeuroImage.

[20]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Infant-like Social Interactions between a Robot and a Human Caregiver , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[21]  L. Pessoa.  On the relationship between emotion and cognition , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[23]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Human-like social skills in dogs? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Mark Johnson.  The meaning of the body : aesthetics of human understanding , 2007 .

[25]  Andrew D. Wilson,et al.  Embodied Cognition is Not What you Think it is , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust , 2003, Neuron.

[27]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[28]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[30]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[31]  T. Ziemke,et al.  Making Sense of Embodied Cognition : Simulation Theories of Shared Neural Mechanisms for Sensorimotor and Cognitive Processes , 2007 .

[32]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations , 2002 .

[33]  P. A. Vijaya,et al.  Investigation of Individual Emotions with GSR and FTT by Employing LabVIEW , 2015 .

[34]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[35]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Towards Natural Emotional Expression and Interaction: Development of Anthropomorphic Emotion Expression and Interaction Robots , 2012, Int. J. Synth. Emot..

[36]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[37]  International Journal of Synthetic Emotions , 2022 .

[38]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..