Alternative binding modes for chloramphenicol and 1-substituted chloramphenicol analogues revealed by site-directed mutagenesis and X-ray crystallography of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

Leucine-160 of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) has been replaced by site-directed mutagenesis to investigate enzyme-ligand interactions at the 1-hydroxyl substituent of the substrate chloramphenicol. The consequences of the substitution of Leu-160 by glutamine and by phenylalanine were deduced from the steady-state kinetic parameters for acetyl transfer from acetyl-CoA to the 3-hydroxyl of chloramphenicol and its analogues 1-deoxychloramphenicol and 1-acetylchloramphenicol. The acetyl group of the latter, which is a substrate both in vivo and in vitro, could potentially bind in a similar position to the 1-hydroxyl of chloramphenicol, in close proximity to the side chain of Leu-160. In the case of Gln-160 CAT, large increases in Km for the three acetyl acceptors were accompanied by small decreases in kcat and in apparent affinity for acetyl-CoA. Such results are consistent with the introduction of the relatively hydrophilic amide in place of the delta-methyl groups of Leu-160. The kinetic properties of Phe-160 CAT were unexpected in that Km for each of the three acetyl acceptors was unchanged or reduced, compared to the equivalent parameters for the wild-type enzyme, whereas kcat fell significantly (44-83-fold) in each case. The ratios of specificity constants (kcat/Km) for the acetylation of chloramphenicol compared with the alternative acyl acceptors were similar for wild-type and mutant enzymes. As the residue substitutions for Leu-160 do not result in enhanced discrimination against the binding and acetylation of 1-acetylchloramphenicol, it appears unlikely that the 1-acetyl group binds to the CAT active site in the same position as that occupied by the 1-hydroxyl of chloramphenicol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  W V Shaw,et al.  Characterization and comparison of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase variants. , 1979, European journal of biochemistry.

[2]  A. Leslie.  Refined crystal structure of type III chloramphenicol acetyltransferase at 1.75 A resolution. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  W V Shaw,et al.  Structure of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase at 1.75-A resolution. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Shaw Wv,et al.  The enzymatic acetylation of chloramphenicol by extracts of R factor-resistant Escherichia coli. , 1967 .

[5]  J. Farkas,et al.  Studies in the chloramphenicol series. V. Side-chain chlorinated analogues, and oxazolines , 1953 .

[6]  J. Knowles,et al.  Searching sequence space by definably random mutagenesis: improving the catalytic potency of an enzyme. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  I A Murray,et al.  Evidence for transition-state stabilization by serine-148 in the catalytic mechanism of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[8]  I A Murray,et al.  Substitutions in the active site of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase: role of a conserved aspartate. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[9]  Thomas A. Kunkel,et al.  Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  P M Cullis,et al.  3-(Bromoacetyl)chloramphenicol, an active site directed inhibitor for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[11]  I A Murray,et al.  Nucleotide sequences of genes encoding the type II chloramphenicol acetyltransferases of Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae, which are sensitive to inhibition by thiol-reactive reagents. , 1990, The Biochemical journal.

[12]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  The interaction between phenylalanine rings in proteins , 1985 .

[13]  J. Knowles,et al.  Evolution of enzyme function and the development of catalytic efficiency. , 1976, Biochemistry.

[14]  I A Murray,et al.  Nucleotide sequence analysis and overexpression of the gene encoding a type III chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. , 1988, The Biochemical journal.

[15]  B. S. Hartley,et al.  Primary structure of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase specified by R plasmids , 1979, Nature.

[16]  G Thibault,et al.  A study of the enzymatic inactivation of chloramphenicol by highly purified chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. , 1980, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  W V Shaw,et al.  Analysis of the mechanism of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase by steady-state kinetics. Evidence for a ternary-complex mechanism. , 1984, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  W V Shaw,et al.  Mechanism of R factor-mediated chloramphenicol resistance , 1968, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  T. A. Jones,et al.  A graphics model building and refinement system for macromolecules , 1978 .

[20]  G A Petsko,et al.  Aromatic-aromatic interaction: a mechanism of protein structure stabilization. , 1985, Science.

[21]  A Lewendon,et al.  Elimination of a reactive thiol group from the active site of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. , 1990, The Biochemical journal.

[22]  A G Leslie,et al.  Crystal structure of the aspartic acid-199----asparagine mutant of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase to 2.35-A resolution: structural consequences of disruption of a buried salt bridge. , 1990, Biochemistry.