Effectiveness of community health workers delivering preventive interventions for maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

BackgroundCommunity Health Workers are widely utilised in low- and middle-income countries and may be an important tool in reducing maternal and child mortality; however, evidence is lacking on their effectiveness for specific types of programmes, specifically programmes of a preventive nature. This review reports findings on a systematic review analysing effectiveness of preventive interventions delivered by Community Health Workers for Maternal and Child Health in low- and middle-income countries.MethodsA search strategy was developed according to the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre’s (EPPI-Centre) guidelines and systematic searching of the following databases occurred between June 8 – 11th, 2012: CINAHL, Embase, Ovid Nursing Database, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and POPLINE. Google, Google Scholar and WHO search engines, as well as relevant systematic reviews and reference lists from included articles were also searched. Inclusion criteria were: i) Target beneficiaries should be pregnant or recently pregnant women and/or children under-5 and/or caregivers of children under-5; ii) Interventions were required to be preventive and delivered by Community Health Workers at the household level. No exclusion criteria were stipulated for comparisons/controls or outcomes. Study characteristics of included articles were extracted using a data sheet and a peer tested quality assessment. A narrative synthesis of included studies was compiled with articles being coded descriptively to synthesise results and draw conclusions.ResultsA total of 10,281 studies were initially identified and through the screening process a total of 17 articles detailing 19 studies were included in the review. Studies came from ten different countries and consisted of randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials, before and after, case control and cross sectional studies. Overall quality of evidence was found to be moderate. Five main preventive intervention categories emerged: malaria prevention, health education, breastfeeding promotion, essential newborn care and psychosocial support. All categories showed some evidence for the effectiveness of Community Health Workers; however they were found to be especially effective in promoting mother-performed strategies (skin to skin care and exclusive breastfeeding).ConclusionsCommunity Health Workers were shown to provide a range of preventive interventions for Maternal and Child Health in low- and middle-income countries with some evidence of effective strategies, though insufficient evidence is available to draw conclusions for most interventions and further research is needed.

[1]  H. Whiteford,et al.  Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency , 2007, The Lancet.

[2]  Agustín Ciapponi,et al.  Strategies for improving the quality of health care in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. , 2008, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[3]  E. Mason,et al.  Building a future for women and children , 2012, The Lancet.

[4]  R. Gordon An operational classification of disease prevention. , 1983, Public health reports.

[5]  Laurie M. Anderson,et al.  The challenges of systematically reviewing public health interventions. , 2004, Journal of public health.

[6]  Postnatal peer counselling on exclusive breastfeeding of low‐birthweight infants: A randomized, controlled trial , 2005 .

[7]  M. Weiss,et al.  Effectiveness of combined intermittent preventive treatment for children and timely home treatment for malaria control , 2009, Malaria Journal.

[8]  M. Sheth,et al.  Diarrhea prevention through food safety education , 2004, Indian journal of pediatrics.

[9]  C. Victora,et al.  Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough , 2003, The Lancet.

[10]  Contributions from M. Walpole The Millennium Development Goals Report , 2008 .

[11]  H. Perry,et al.  How effective is community-based primary health care in improving the health of children? Summary findings. Report to the Expert Review Panel. A review of the evidence. , 2009 .

[12]  Simon Lewin,et al.  Thirty years after Alma-Ata: a systematic review of the impact of community health workers delivering curative interventions against malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea on child mortality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa , 2011, Human resources for health.

[13]  G. Darmstadt,et al.  Can early postpartum home visits by trained community health workers improve breastfeeding of newborns? , 2008, Journal of Perinatology.

[14]  G. Fink,et al.  Preventing malaria in pregnancy through community-directed interventions: evidence from Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria , 2011, Malaria Journal.

[15]  Cesar G Victora,et al.  How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings? , 2005, The Lancet.

[16]  H. Gibson,et al.  Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage at home birth in Afghanistan , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[17]  Gordon Rs,et al.  An operational classification of disease prevention. , 1983 .

[18]  R. Black,et al.  Trends in Use of Referral Hospital Services for Care of Sick Newborns in a Community-based Intervention in Tangail District, Bangladesh , 2006, Journal of health, population, and nutrition.

[19]  A. Haines,et al.  Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers , 2007, The Lancet.

[20]  Salahuddin Ahmed,et al.  Adaptation of Kangaroo Mother Care for Community-Based Application , 2003, Journal of Perinatology.

[21]  F. Song,et al.  Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[22]  Salahuddin Ahmed,et al.  Community-Based Kangaroo Mother Care to Prevent Neonatal and Infant Mortality: A Randomized, Controlled Cluster Trial , 2008, Pediatrics.

[23]  S. Huttly,et al.  Effect of community-based peer counsellors on exclusive breastfeeding practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomised controlled trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[24]  U. Halbreich,et al.  Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. , 2006, Journal of affective disorders.

[25]  J. Shults,et al.  Efficacy of home-based peer counselling to promote exclusive breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[26]  K. Wotton,et al.  Can Volunteer Community Health Workers Decrease Child Morbidity and Mortality in Southwestern Uganda? An Impact Evaluation , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  R. Zulliger,et al.  How effective are community health workers? An Overview of Current Evidence with Recommendations for Strengthening Community Health Worker Programs to Accelerate Progress in Achieving the Health-related Millennium Development Goals. , 2012 .

[28]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[29]  J. Popay,et al.  The challenges of systematically reviewing public health interventions N. Jackson, E. Waters and the Guidelines for Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions Taskforce , 2004 .

[30]  S. Awasthi,et al.  Introduction of community-based skin-to-skin care in rural Uttar Pradesh, India , 2006, Journal of Perinatology.

[31]  Amit Prasad,et al.  Background papers for Working together for health: The World Health Report 2006 , 2006 .

[32]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[33]  M. Chopra,et al.  Exclusive breastfeeding promotion by peer counsellors in sub-Saharan Africa (PROMISE-EBF): a cluster-randomised trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[34]  G. Cummings,et al.  Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[35]  Robert E Black,et al.  Effect of community-based behaviour change management on neonatal mortality in Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[36]  A. Malik,et al.  Cognitive Behavior Therapy-based Intervention by Community Health Workers for Mothers With Depression and Their Infants in Rural Pakistan: A Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial , 2009 .

[37]  Taghreed Adam,et al.  Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? , 2005, The Lancet.

[38]  Guy M. Goodwin,et al.  Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2004, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[39]  Francis Creed,et al.  Cognitive behaviour therapy-based intervention by community health workers for mothers with depression and their infants in rural Pakistan: a cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[40]  Elizabeth Waters,et al.  Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. , 2005 .

[41]  L. Swartz,et al.  Improving quality of mother-infant relationship and infant attachment in socioeconomically deprived community in South Africa: randomised controlled trial , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  Z. Bhutta,et al.  How many child deaths can we prevent this year? , 2003, The Lancet.

[43]  A. Zaidi,et al.  Does improving maternal knowledge of vaccines impact infant immunization rates? A community-based randomized-controlled trial in Karachi, Pakistan , 2011, BMC public health.

[44]  O. Campbell,et al.  Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works , 2006, The Lancet.