Optimising diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: comparison of image quality between monopolar and bipolar single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences

ObjectiveTo compare geometric distortion, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), efficacy of fat suppression and presence of artefact between monopolar (Stejskal and Tanner) and bipolar (twice-refocused, eddy-current-compensating) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences in the abdomen and pelvis.Materials and methodsA semiquantitative distortion index (DI) was derived from the subtraction images with b = 0 and 1,000 s/mm2 in a phantom and compared between the two sequences. Seven subjects were imaged with both sequences using four b values (0, 600, 900 and 1,050 s/mm2) and SNR, ADC for different organs and fat-to-muscle signal ratio (FMR) were compared. Image quality was evaluated by two radiologists on a 5-point scale.ResultsDI was improved in the bipolar sequence, indicating less geometric distortion. SNR was significantly lower for all tissues and b values in the bipolar images compared with the monopolar (p < 0.05), whereas FMR was not statistically different. ADC in liver, kidney and sacrum was higher in the bipolar scheme compared to the monopolar (p < 0.03), whereas in muscle it was lower (p = 0.018). Image quality scores were higher for the bipolar sequence (p ≤ 0.025).ConclusionArtefact reduction makes the bipolar DWI sequence preferable in abdominopelvic applications, although the trade-off in SNR may compromise ADC measurements in muscle.

[1]  Takeshi Yoshikawa,et al.  ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  M. Koch,et al.  An assessment of eddy current sensitivity and correction in single-shot diffusion-weighted imaging. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Johannes T Heverhagen,et al.  Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  M. Buonocore,et al.  Ghost artifact reduction for echo planar imaging using image phase correction , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Tetsuro Yamazaki,et al.  High b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting gallbladder carcinoma: preliminary study and results , 2009, European Radiology.

[6]  F Schick,et al.  Echoplanar diffusion tensor imaging of the lower leg musculature using eddy current nulled stimulated echo preparation , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  P. Aspelin,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours , 2009, European Radiology.

[8]  R. Hermans,et al.  Predictive value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2010, European Radiology.

[9]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Harsh Kandpal,et al.  Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  C. Tempelmann,et al.  Eddy current correction in diffusion‐weighted imaging using pairs of images acquired with opposite diffusion gradient polarity , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Ioannis Delakis,et al.  MRI receiver frequency response as a contributor to Nyquist ghosting in echo planar imaging , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  E. Merkle,et al.  Field Strength and Diffusion Encoding Technique Affect the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[14]  D. Parker,et al.  Elimination of eddy current artifacts in diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar images: The use of bipolar gradients , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[16]  E. Merkle,et al.  Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. , 2009, Radiology.

[17]  D. Collins,et al.  Predicting response of colorectal hepatic metastasis: value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficients. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Diffusion anisotropy indexes are sensitive to selecting the EPI readout-encoding bandwidth at high-field MRI. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  C. Pierpaoli,et al.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  J. Finsterbusch.  Eddy‐current compensated diffusion weighting with a single refocusing RF pulse , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Spin diffusion measurements : spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient , 1965 .