A Meta‐Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance

Studies linking environmental sustainability to firm performance have been increasing as more companies are contemplating the implementation of sustainable practices internally and in coordination with other firms along their supply chains. However, findings from these studies have found positive and negative associations, leaving practitioners perplexed as to what actions would be beneficial to pursue. With hypotheses grounded in the natural resource–based view of the firm, the current study examines over 20 years of research on environmental supply chain practices using a meta-analysis to determine whether the overall effect of these specific practices on firm performance is, in fact, positive. The results show that the link between environmental supply chain practices and market-based, operational-based and accounting-based forms of firm performance is positive and significant, providing support for the business case that sustainable supply chain management results in increased firm performance. Different operationalizations of supply chain practices — upstream, design, production and downstream — along with industry, sample region, firm size and time are examined as moderators of this relationship with nuanced results that help to extend the discipline's understanding of the relationship between environmentally sustainable supply chain management and firm performance.

[1]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and causality , 1979 .

[2]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[3]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[4]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[5]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[6]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[7]  Meni Koslowsky,et al.  DETECTING MODERATORS WITH META‐ANALYSIS: AN EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES , 1993 .

[8]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[9]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[10]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[11]  D. Wood,et al.  STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[12]  Jeff Frooman,et al.  Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth , 1997 .

[13]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[14]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[15]  Anil Menon,et al.  Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Market Strategy , 1997 .

[16]  Brian S. Klaas,et al.  MANAGERIAL USE OF DISMISSAL: ORGANIZATIONAL‐LEVEL DETERMINANTS , 1997 .

[17]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[18]  W. Davidson,et al.  Corporate Environmental Initiatives and Anticipated Firm Performance: The Differential Effects of Process-Driven Versus Product-Driven Greening Initiatives , 2000 .

[19]  C. Carter,et al.  Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation , 2000 .

[20]  John D. Benjamin,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2001 .

[21]  Marc Orlitzky,et al.  Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? , 2001 .

[22]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[23]  Björn Sven Ivens,et al.  Hunt, Shelby D., A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi 2000, geb., $ 89,95 , 2002 .

[24]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[25]  Pedro Manuel Saraiva,et al.  ISO 9000: Some statistical results for a worldwide phenomenon , 2003 .

[26]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OPERATIONAL PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE AMONG EARLY ADOPTERS OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES , 2004 .

[27]  C. Carter.  Purchasing and Social Responsibility: A Replication and Extension , 2004 .

[28]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  Meta-Analysis: A Comparison of Approaches , 2004 .

[29]  P. Daugherty,et al.  The role of resource commitment and innovation in reverse logistics performance , 2005 .

[30]  Keely L. Croxton,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF PROCESS‐ORIENTED SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS , 2005 .

[31]  P. Rao,et al.  Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance , 2005 .

[32]  J. González‐Benito,et al.  Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis , 2005 .

[33]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis , 2006 .

[34]  Yu‐Shan Chen,et al.  The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan , 2006 .

[35]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[36]  R. Klassen,et al.  GREEN PROJECT PARTNERSHIP IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN: THE CASE OF THE PACKAGE PRINTING INDUSTRY , 2006 .

[37]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  PUBLICATION BIAS: A CASE STUDY OF FOUR TEST VENDORS , 2006 .

[38]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications , 2007 .

[39]  K. Lai,et al.  Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry , 2007 .

[40]  Chih-Hung Tsai,et al.  The Effect of Green Design Activities on New Product Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Study among High-Tech Companies , 2007 .

[41]  J. Linton,et al.  Sustainable supply chains: An introduction , 2007 .

[42]  Samir K. Srivastava,et al.  Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review , 2007 .

[43]  J. Jayaram,et al.  Relationship building, lean strategy and firm performance: an exploratory study in the automotive supplier industry , 2008 .

[44]  John Andy Wood,et al.  Methodology for Dealing With Duplicate Study Effects in a Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[45]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Comparison of Three Meta-Analytic Procedures for Estimating Moderating Effects of Categorical Variables , 2008 .

[46]  Garry L. Adams,et al.  Supply Chain Orientation and Balanced Scorecard Performance , 2008 .

[47]  R. Klassen,et al.  Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain , 2008 .

[48]  Paul T. Bryant,et al.  Examining the impact of reverse logistics disposition strategies , 2008 .

[49]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Assessing the Core Resources in the Environmental Management System From the Resource Perspective and the Contingency Perspective , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[50]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research , 2008 .

[51]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[52]  E. Fraj-Andrés,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on the Firm’s Organizational Performance , 2009 .

[53]  Yu-Shu Peng,et al.  Local Responsiveness Pressure, Subsidiary Resources, Green Management Adoption and Subsidiary’s Performance: Evidence from Taiwanese Manufactures , 2008 .

[54]  Donna F. Davis,et al.  GROUNDING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN RESOURCE‐ADVANTAGE THEORY* , 2008 .

[55]  Yu‐Shan Chen.  The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence , 2008 .

[56]  S. Seuring,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review , 2009 .

[57]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT: INTRODUCTION TO PART 1 (MANUFACTURING AND ECOLOGISTICS) , 2009 .

[58]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  A Review and Evaluation of Meta-Analysis Practices in Management Research , 2009 .

[59]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Sustainable Operations Management , 2005 .

[60]  Craig R. Carter,et al.  FOOD FOR THOUGHT: SOCIAL VERSUS ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES , 2009 .

[61]  A. Soteriou,et al.  GREENING THE SERVICE PROFIT CHAIN: THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES , 2003 .

[62]  Robert Sroufe,et al.  EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND OPERATIONS , 2003 .

[63]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance , 2009 .

[64]  Festus O. Olorunniwo,et al.  Information sharing and collaboration practices in reverse logistics , 2010 .

[65]  Michael J. Maloni,et al.  Sustainability Practices in Food Supply Chains: How is Wine Different? , 2010 .

[66]  José F. Molina-Azorín,et al.  The potential of environmental regulation to change managerial perception, environmental management, competitiveness and financial performance , 2010 .

[67]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Impact of lean strategy on operational performance: a study of Thai manufacturing companies , 2010 .

[68]  D. Wood.  Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review , 2010 .

[69]  S. Zeng,et al.  Impact of cleaner production on business performance , 2010 .

[70]  Chwen Sheu,et al.  Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing competitiveness: An empirical study , 2010 .

[71]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management , 2011 .

[72]  Cristina Giménez Thomsen,et al.  Drivers of green supply management performance: Evidence from Germany , 2011 .

[73]  Mark Pagell,et al.  IS THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT FILE DRAWER EMPTY , 2011 .

[74]  Ma Ga Yang,et al.  Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[75]  H. Chan,et al.  The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan , 2011 .

[76]  Catherine M. Dalton,et al.  Debunking Myths and Urban Legends About Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[77]  Antony Paulraj,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INTERNAL RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES, SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY† , 2011 .

[78]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  A Demand‐side Perspective on Supply Chain Management , 2012 .

[79]  J. Barney.  Purchasing, Supply Chain Management and Sustained Competitive Advantage: The Relevance of Resource-based Theory , 2012 .

[80]  F. Wolf.  Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis , 1987 .

[81]  Wenxing Wang.  Green supply chain management: A state of the art review , 2014, The 26th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2014 CCDC).