An Integrated Working Memory Model for Time-Based Resource-Sharing

The time-based resource-sharing (TBRS) model envisions working memory as a rapidly switching, serial, attentional refreshing mechanism. Executive attention trades its time between rebuilding decaying memory traces and processing extraneous activity. To thoroughly investigate the implications of the TBRS theory, we integrated TBRS within the ACT-R cognitive architecture, which allowed us to test the TBRS model against both participant accuracy and response time data in a dual task environment. In the current work, we extend the model to include articulatory rehearsal, which has been argued in the literature to be a separate mechanism from attentional refreshing. Additionally, we use the model to predict performance under a larger range of cognitive load (CL) than typically administered to human subjects. Our simulations support the hypothesis that working memory capacity is a linear function of CL and suggest that this effect is less pronounced when articulatory rehearsal is available.

[1]  N. Cowan.  On short and long auditory stores. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  R. Case,et al.  Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span , 1982 .

[4]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory. , 2012, Psychological review.

[5]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  A temporal–contextual retrieval account of complex span: An analysis of errors , 2006 .

[6]  C. Lebiere,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Modeling Working Memory in a Unified Architecture: An ACT-R Perspective , 1999 .

[7]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. , 2011, Psychological review.

[9]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Developing Operator Capacity Estimates for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Vehicles , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Joseph J. Glavan.  Exploring the Time-Based Resource-Sharing Model of Working Memory Through Computational Modeling , 2017 .

[11]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  John Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning. , 2007, Psychological review.

[13]  C. Lebiere,et al.  An integrated theory of list memory. , 1998 .

[14]  B. Murdock,et al.  Positional and temporal clustering in serial order memory , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Modeling working memory: a computational implementation of the Time-Based Resource-Sharing theory , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  N. Burgess,et al.  A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences , 2006 .

[17]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[18]  Sophie Portrat,et al.  What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing? , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Attentional and non-attentional systems in the maintenance of verbal information in working memory: the executive and phonological loops , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  H Pashler,et al.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. , 2000, Psychological review.