Simulation-based Multiple Project Management in Engineering Design

In this paper a person-centered, actor-driven project simulation approach is presented that can cope with highly parallel tasks in multiple projects and can, therefore, help managers to plan concurrent product development projects. The task execution sequence is determined by means of a bounded rational choice model accounting for the urgency of tasks. The model creates realistic project dynamics using only a small number of input parameters. The project manager is, for instance, not forced to specify fixed predecessor-successor-relations of tasks. The model was validated with historical project data from a company of the German electronics industry. Using Student’s t-tests the simulated project durations showed no significant derivation from the historical duration.

[1]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The Virtual Team Alliance (VTA): Extending Galbraith’s Information-Processing Model to Account for Goal Incongruency , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[2]  A. Kumar,et al.  Use of Petri nets for resource allocation in projects , 1998 .

[3]  Christopher M. Schlick,et al.  Person-centred simulation of product development processes , 2007, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[4]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  The Virtual Design Team: An Object-Oriented Model of Information Sharing in Project Design Teams , 1991 .

[5]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Integrating Theories of Motivation , 2006 .

[6]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[7]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Computational organization theory , 1994 .

[8]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Generalized models of design iteration using signal flow graphs , 1995 .

[10]  N. Gil,et al.  Modeling design development in unpredictable environments , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[11]  David N. Ford,et al.  Tipping point failure and robustness in single development projects , 2006 .

[12]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  From project to process management: an empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time , 1995 .

[13]  Yan Jin,et al.  The “virtual design team”: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance , 1994 .

[14]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Generalised models of design interation using signal flow graphs , 1997 .

[15]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  A dynamic model of resource allocation in multi-project research and development systems , 2000 .

[16]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Modeling the design process with Petri nets , 1993 .

[17]  David N. Ford,et al.  Overcoming the 90% Syndrome: Iteration Management in Concurrent Development Projects , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[18]  D. Kahneman.  MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 2003 .

[19]  George Ainslie,et al.  A Marketplace in the Brain? , 2004, Science.

[20]  Lindsey Gillson,et al.  Space--The Final Frontier for Economists and Elephants , 2004, Science.

[21]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Performance Variability and Project Dynamics , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[22]  Holger Luczak,et al.  Knowledge Representation for Engineering Design Based on a Cognitive Model , 2000 .