The effect of health, socio-economic position, and mode of data collection on non-response in health interview surveys

Aims: To investigate the relationship between potential explanatory factors (socio-economic factors and health) and non-response in two general population health interview surveys (face-to-face and telephone), and to compare the effects of the two interview modes on non-response patterns. Methods: Data derives from The Danish Health Interview Survey 2000 (face-to-face interview) and The Funen County Health Survey 2000/2001 (telephone interview). Data on all invited individuals were obtained from administrative registers and linked to survey data at individual level. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations between potential explanatory factors and non-response. Results: The overall response rate was higher in the face-to-face interview survey (74.5%) than in the telephone survey (69.2%). Refusal was the most common reason for non-response and the same factors were generally associated with non-response in both modes of interview. The non-response rate was high among persons with low socio-economic position. No significant associations between health and non-response were found. Conclusions: Health status does not play a systematic role for non-response rates in health interview surveys, but the non-response rate is higher in lower socio-economic groups. Analyses of non-response should be performed to understand the implications of survey findings.

[1]  O. Ekholm,et al.  The study design and characteristics of the Danish national health interview surveys , 2009, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[2]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Gundgaard,et al.  The effect of non-response on estimates of health care utilisation: linking health surveys and registers. , 2007, European journal of public health.

[5]  Edith D. de Leeuw,et al.  The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[6]  S. Galea,et al.  Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. , 2007, Annals of epidemiology.

[7]  Hanna Tolonen,et al.  25-year Trends and Socio-demographic Differences in Response Rates: Finnish Adult Health Behaviour Survey , 2006, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[8]  P. Hartge.  Participation in population studies. , 2006, Epidemiology.

[9]  M. Kjøller,et al.  Characteristics of non-response in the Danish Health Interview Surveys, 1987-1994. , 2005, European journal of public health.

[10]  C Borrell,et al.  Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries. , 2005, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  J. Mackenbach,et al.  Educational inequalities in smoking among men and women aged 16 years and older in 11 European countries , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[12]  K. Jöckel,et al.  Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  R. Groves.  Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys , 2006 .

[14]  P. Rautava,et al.  Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[15]  G. Cohen,et al.  Are nonrespondents to health surveys less healthy than respondents , 2002 .

[16]  John Van Hoewyk,et al.  The Effect of Incentives on Response Rates in Interviewer-Mediated Surveys , 1999 .

[17]  C. Shettle,et al.  Monetary Incentives in U. S. Government Surveys , 1999 .

[18]  H. Adami,et al.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.