Validity of COSMED's Quark CPET Mixing Chamber System in Evaluating Energy Metabolism During Aerobic Exercise in Healthy Male Adults

This study validated the accuracy of COSMED's Quark cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) metabolic mixing chamber system in measuring metabolic factors during maximal, graded exercise testing. Subjects included 32 physically active men between the ages of 18 and 34 years. During the first test session, subjects were measured for maximal oxygen consumption twice (15 min separation) with the CPET and Douglas bag systems (random order). During the second test session, subjects exercised through four stages of the Bruce treadmill protocol with measurement by the CPET and Douglas bag systems (random order) during steady state at the end of each 3-minute stage. Statistical analysis using a 2 (systems) x 5 (time) repeated measures ANOVA showed that the pattern of change in VO2, VCO2, VE, FeO2, FeCO2, and RER did not differ significantly between CPET and Douglas bag systems. This validation study indicates that the CPET mixing chamber system provides valid metabolic measurements that compare closely with the Douglas bag system during aerobic exercise.

[1]  Asker E. Jeukendrup,et al.  Validity and reliability of three commercially available breath-by-breath respiratory systems , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[2]  C. G. Douglas A method for determinng the total respiratory exchange in man. , 1911 .

[3]  D R Bassett,et al.  Validity of inspiratory and expiratory methods of measuring gas exchange with a computerized system. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  D A Brodie,et al.  Validity and reliability of selected commercially available metabolic analyzer systems , 2005, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[5]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. , 1973, American heart journal.

[6]  David R Bassett,et al.  Validation of the Cosmed Fitmate for Prediction of Maximal Oxygen Consumption , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[7]  R. Davison,et al.  Ambulatory Gas Exchange Measurements - Current Status and Future Options , 2004, International journal of sports medicine.

[8]  T. Verde,et al.  Four commonly utilized metabolic systems fail to produce similar results during submaximal and maximal exercise , 1994 .

[9]  J. Unick,et al.  Validation of Cosmed's FitMate™ in Measuring Exercise Metabolism , 2007, Research in sports medicine.

[10]  D J Macfarlane,et al.  Automated Metabolic Gas Analysis Systems , 2001, Sports medicine.

[11]  R. Withers,et al.  CPX/D underestimates VO(2) in athletes compared with an automated Douglas bag system. , 2003, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

[12]  S. Crouter,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of the ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400 and MedGraphics VO2000 metabolic systems , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[13]  C J Gore,et al.  Automated VO2max calibrator for open-circuit indirect calorimetry systems. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  D. Bentley,et al.  Portable gas analyser Cosmed K4b2 compared to a laboratory based mass spectrometer system. , 2005, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[15]  T. Meyer,et al.  Effectiveness of low-intensity endurance training. , 2007, International journal of sports medicine.

[16]  J. Hallén,et al.  Validity and Stability of a Computerized Metabolic System with Mixing Chamber , 2004, International journal of sports medicine.