The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking

A new, rigorous model is developed for the difference of gravitational potential between two close earth-orbiting satellites in terms of measured range-rates, velocities and velocity differences, and specific forces. It is particularly suited to regional geopotential determination from a satellite-to-satellite tracking mission. Based on energy considerations, the model specifically accounts for the time variability of the potential in inertial space, principally due to earth’s rotation. Analysis shows the latter to be a significant (±1 m2/s2) effect that overshadows by many orders of magnitude other time dependencies caused by solar and lunar tidal potentials. Also, variations in earth rotation with respect to terrestrial and celestial coordinate frames are inconsequential. Results of simulations contrast the new model to the simplified linear model (relating potential difference to range-rate) and delineate accuracy requirements in velocity vector measurements needed to supplement the range-rate measurements. The numerical analysis is oriented toward the scheduled Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission and shows that an accuracy in the velocity difference vector of 2×10−5 m/s would be commensurate within the model to the anticipated accuracy of 10−6 m/s in range-rate.

[1]  J. K. Rees Spherical and Practical Astronomy , 1892 .

[2]  T. Teichmann,et al.  Fundamentals of celestial mechanics , 1963 .

[3]  M. Wolff,et al.  Direct measurements of the Earth's gravitational potential using a satellite pair , 1969 .

[4]  A drag-free Lo-Lo satellite system for improved gravity field measurements , 1978 .

[5]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Accuracy of the determination of mean anomalies and mean geoid undulations from a satellite gravity field mapping mission , 1980 .

[6]  Geoid Heights, Geoid Height Differences, and Mean Gravity Anomalies from 'Low-Low' Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking - An Error Analysis, , 1980 .

[7]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[8]  C. Wagner Direct determination of gravitational harmonics from low‐low GRAVSAT data , 1983 .

[9]  Geopotential research mission, science, engineering and program summary , 1986 .

[10]  Book-Review - General Relativity - a Guide to its Consequences for Gravity and Cosmology , 1988 .

[11]  A Spaceborne Gravity Gradiometer for the Nineties , 1990 .

[12]  C. Jekeli,et al.  Gravity estimation from STAGE, a Satellite‐to‐Satellite Tracking Mission , 1990 .

[13]  Ho Jung Paik,et al.  Superconducting gravity gradiometer mission. , 1993 .

[14]  Chris Stormer,et al.  Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac , 1995 .

[15]  D. Mccarthy IERS Conventions (1996). , 1996 .

[16]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96 , 1998 .

[17]  Baltimore County The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96 , 1998 .

[18]  GRACE: a satellite-to-satellite tracking geopotential mapping mission , 1999 .