Water quality modelling for ephemeral rivers: Model development and parameter assessment

Summary River water quality models can be valuable tools for the assessment and management of receiving water body quality. However, such water quality models require accurate model calibration in order to specify model parameters. Reliable model calibration requires an extensive array of water quality data that are generally rare and resource-intensive, both economically and in terms of human resources, to collect. In the case of small rivers, such data are scarce due to the fact that these rivers are generally considered too insignificant, from a practical and economic viewpoint, to justify the investment of such considerable time and resources. As a consequence, the literature contains very few studies on the water quality modelling for small rivers, and such studies as have been published are fairly limited in scope. In this paper, a simplified river water quality model is presented. The model is an extension of the Streeter–Phelps model and takes into account the physico-chemical and biological processes most relevant to modelling the quality of receiving water bodies (i.e., degradation of dissolved carbonaceous substances, ammonium oxidation, algal uptake and denitrification, dissolved oxygen balance, including depletion by degradation processes and supply by physical reaeration and photosynthetic production). The model has been applied to an Italian case study, the Oreto river (IT), which has been the object of an Italian research project aimed at assessing the river’s water quality. For this reason, several monitoring campaigns have been previously carried out in order to collect water quantity and quality data on this river system. In particular, twelve river cross sections were monitored, and both flow and water quality data were collected for each cross section. The results of the calibrated model show satisfactory agreement with the measured data and results reveal important differences between the parameters used to model small rivers as compared to those for large rivers. Additionally, these results appear related to the different roles played by physical–chemical–biological processes in small rivers as compared to larger systems.

[1]  S. Marsili-Libelli,et al.  Water quality modelling for small river basins , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[3]  P. Whitehead,et al.  Calibration and sensitivity analysis of a river water quality model under unsteady flow conditions , 2003 .

[4]  B A Cox,et al.  A review of dissolved oxygen modelling techniques for lowland rivers. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Jeffrey D. Niemann,et al.  Evaluating the parameter identifiability and structural validity of a probability-distributed model for soil moisture , 2008 .

[6]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. , 2008, Water research.

[7]  Keith Beven,et al.  Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall–runoff model , 1998 .

[8]  Andrzej Kraslawski,et al.  Development, calibration and evaluation of two mathematical models for pollutant transport in a small river , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[9]  I. Dubus,et al.  Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  J. Berlamont,et al.  Modelling of dissolved oxygen and biochemical oxygen demand in river water using a detailed and a simplified model , 2003 .

[11]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Parsimonious Model for Combined Sewer Overflow Pollution , 2004 .

[12]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures , 2004 .

[13]  Michael Rode,et al.  Modelling the impact of river morphology on nitrogen retention—A case study of the Weisse Elster River (Germany) , 2008 .

[14]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[15]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[16]  Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis of Conventional Water Treatment Plant Design for Suspended Solids Removal , 2006 .

[17]  E. Jeppesen,et al.  Reaeration of Oxygen in Shallow, Macrophyte Rich Streams: I – Determination of the Reaeration Rate Coefficient , 1987 .

[18]  B. Adams,et al.  Analytical urban storm water quality models based on pollutant buildup and washoff processes , 2006 .

[19]  H. Künsch,et al.  Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models , 2001 .

[20]  M. Owens,et al.  SOME REAERATION STUDIES IN STREAMS. , 1964, Air and water pollution.

[21]  J. Bennett,et al.  Reaeration in open-channel flow , 1972 .

[22]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Identifiability analysis for receiving water body quality modelling , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Poul Harremoës,et al.  Stochastic models for estimation of extreme pollution from urban runoff , 1988 .

[24]  Gürkan Sin,et al.  A calibration methodology and model-based systems analysis for SBRs removing nutrients under limited aeration conditions , 2006 .

[25]  G. Viviani,et al.  An urban drainage stormwater quality model model development and uncertainty quantification , 2010 .

[26]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  A parsimonious dynamic model for river water quality assessment. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  Donald J. O'Connor,et al.  Mechanism of Reaeration in Natural Streams , 1958 .

[29]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  Uncertainty Assessment of a Water-Quality Model for Ephemeral Rivers Using GLUE Analysis , 2011 .

[30]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[31]  R. Thomann,et al.  Principles of surface water quality modeling and control , 1987 .

[32]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: The question of parameter observability and uniqueness , 1983 .