On stochastic study of well capture zones in bounded, randomly heterogeneous media

[1] Accurately determining well capture zones is of great importance in aquifer cleanup and for the protection of drinking water. Earlier models in delineating capture zones assumed the medium to be homogeneous. Recently, stochastic approaches have been applied to studying capture zones in heterogeneous media. The Monte Carlo method is commonly used to infer the probability distribution of the resulting capture zones from multiple realizations of the aquifer of interest. In this study, we present a moment-equation-based approach to derive the time-dependent mean capture zones and their associated uncertainties. The flow statistics are obtained by solving the first two moments of flow, and the mean capture zones are determined by reversely tracking the nonreactive particles released at a small circle around each pumping well. The uncertainty associated with the mean capture zones is calculated based on the particle displacement covariance Xij for nonstationary flow fields. For comparison purposes, we also conducted Monte Carlo simulations. It has been found that our model results are in excellent agreement with Monte Carlo results.

[1]  J. M. Shafer,et al.  Assessment of Uncertainty in Time‐Related Capture Zones Using Conditional Simulation of Hydraulic Conductivity , 1991 .

[2]  H. Zhan.  Analytical and Numerical Modeling of a Double Well Capture Zone , 1999 .

[3]  Solute Transport Analysis Through Heterogeneous Media in Nonuniform in the Average Flow by a Stochastic Approach , 1999 .

[4]  Matthijs van Leeuwen,et al.  Stochastic determination of well capture zones , 1998 .

[5]  Stuart Grubb.  Analytical Model for Estimation of Steady-State Capture Zones of Pumping Wells in Confined and Unconfined Aquifers , 1993 .

[6]  You‐Kuan Zhang.  Stochastic Methods for Flow in Porous Media: Coping with Uncertainties , 2001 .

[7]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Time‐Related Capture Zones for Contaminants in Randomly Heterogeneous Formations , 1999 .

[8]  G. Dagan.  Solute Transport at the Local (Formation) Scale , 1989 .

[9]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  CAPTURE-ZONE TYPE CURVES: A TOOL FOR AQUIFER CLEANUP , 1986 .

[10]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Probabilistic estimation of well catchments in heterogeneous aquifers , 1996 .

[11]  Y. Rubin.  Stochastic modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media , 1990 .

[12]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Conditional stochastic averaging of steady state unsaturated flow by means of Kirchhoff Transformation , 1999 .

[13]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Eulerian‐Lagrangian Analysis of Transport Conditioned on Hydraulic Data: 1. Analytical‐Numerical Approach , 1995 .

[14]  I. M. Pyshik,et al.  Table of integrals, series, and products , 1965 .

[15]  G. Dagan.  Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  David C. Schafer,et al.  Determining 3D Capture Zones in Homogeneous, Anisotropic Aquifers , 1996 .

[17]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  Computation of stochastic wellhead protection zones by combining the first-order second-moment method and Kolmogorov backward equation analysis , 2000 .

[18]  Uncertainty estimation of well catchments in heterogeneous aquifers , 2002 .

[19]  K. Bhatt.  Uncertainty in wellhead protection area delineation due to uncertainty in aquifer parameter values , 1993 .

[20]  C. L. Winter,et al.  Nonstationary stochastic analysis of steady state flow through variably saturated, heterogeneous media , 1998 .

[21]  E. Scott Bair,et al.  A Monte Carlo-Based Approach for Determining Traveltime-Related Capture Zones of Wells Using Convex Hulls as Confidence Regions , 1991 .

[22]  Chao Shan,et al.  An analytical solution for the capture zone of two arbitrarily located wells , 1999 .

[23]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Correction to “Prediction of steady state flow in nonuniform geologic media by conditional moments: Exact nonlocal formalism, effective conductivities, and weak approximation” by Shlomo P. Neuman and Shlomo Orr , 1993 .

[24]  G. Dagan.  Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[25]  E. Bair,et al.  Variations in capture-zone geometry of a partially penetrating pumping well in an unconfined aquifer , 1996 .

[26]  Dongxiao Zhang.  7 – FLOW IN FRACTURED POROUS MEDIA , 2002 .

[27]  V. Zlotnik.  Effects of Anisotropy on the Capture Zone of a Partially Penetrating Well , 1997 .

[28]  Stephen E. Silliman,et al.  Capture Zones for Passive Wells in Heterogeneous Unconfined Aquifers , 1997 .

[29]  J. Bear,et al.  On the movement of water bodies injected into aquifers , 1965 .

[30]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Nonlocal and localized analyses of conditional mean steady state flow in bounded, randomly nonuniform domains: 1. Theory and computational approach , 1999 .

[31]  David N. Lerner,et al.  Well catchments and time‐of‐travel zones in aquifers with recharge , 1992 .

[32]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Prediction of solute spreading during vertical infiltration in unsaturated, bounded heterogeneous porous media , 2000 .

[33]  B. Robinson,et al.  Summary of the Models and Methods for the FEHM Application-A Finite-Element Heat- and Mass-Transfer Code , 1997 .

[34]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Time-related capture zones for radial flow in two dimensional randomly heterogeneous media , 1999 .

[35]  H. Zhan.  Analytical study of capture time to a horizontal well , 1999 .

[36]  Y. Jeffrey Yang,et al.  Analytical Solutions for Determination of Non‐Steady‐ State and Steady‐State Capture Zones , 1995 .

[37]  M. N. Özişik.  Boundary value problems of heat conduction , 1989 .

[38]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Stochastic analysis of flow in a heterogeneous unsaturated‐saturated system , 2002 .

[39]  E. C. Childs.  Dynamics of fluids in Porous Media , 1973 .

[40]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Solute spreading in nonstationary flows in bounded, heterogeneous unsaturated‐saturated media , 2003 .

[41]  Otto D Strack,et al.  Groundwater mechanics , 1989 .