An image analysis method for prostate tissue classification: preliminary validation with resonance sensor data

Resonance sensor systems have been shown to be able to distinguish between cancerous and normal prostate tissue, in vitro. The aim of this study was to improve the accuracy of the tissue determination, to simplify the tissue classification process with computerized morphometrical analysis, to decrease the risk of human errors, and to reduce the processing time. In this article we present our newly developed computerized classification method based on image analysis. In relation to earlier resonance sensor studies we increased the number of normal prostate tissue classes into stroma, epithelial tissue, lumen and stones. The linearity between the impression depth and tissue classes was calculated using multiple linear regression (R2 = 0.68, n = 109, p < 0.001) and partial least squares (R2 = 0.55, n = 109, p < 0.001). Thus it can be concluded that there existed a linear relationship between the impression depth and the tissue classes. The new image analysis method was easy to handle and decreased the classification time by 80%.

[1]  Peter Lindberg,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with an improved resonance sensor system: parameter evaluation in a silicone model and on human prostate tissue in vitro , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  R L Reuben,et al.  Measurement of the mechanical characteristics of benign prostatic tissue: a novel method for assessing benign prostatic disease. , 2005, Urology.

[3]  D Robert Siemens,et al.  Prostatitis and prostate cancer: implications for prostate cancer screening. , 2004, Urology.

[4]  Sadao Omata,et al.  New tactile sensor like the human hand and its applications , 1992 .

[5]  Fritz H. Schröder,et al.  Evaluation of the Digital Rectal Examination as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer , 1998 .

[6]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial , 1986 .

[7]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[8]  O. Lindahl,et al.  Resonance sensor measurements of stiffness variations in prostate tissue in vitro—a weighted tissue proportion model , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[9]  S. Omata,et al.  Impression technique for the assessment of oedema: comparison with a new tactile sensor that measures physical properties of tissue , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[11]  Transrectal Ultrasound of the Prostate: Innovations and Future Applications , 1998 .

[12]  F. Bray,et al.  Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[13]  R. Reuben,et al.  Measurement of tissue mechanical characteristics to distinguish between benign and malignant prostatic disease. , 2005, Urology.

[14]  O. Lindahl,et al.  A catheter tactile sensor for measuring hardness of soft tissue: measurement in a silicone model and in anin vitro human prostate model , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.