Deploying Robots in a Production Environment: A Study on Temporal Transitions of Workers' Experiences

Understanding a worker’s perspective when introducing robots at humans’ workplaces is crucial to improve human-robot interaction in production environments. Taking a temporal perspective on workers’ experiences with robots, we explored expectations and general attitudes as well as actual feelings and reflections regarding the deployment of robots in a semiconductor factory. To evoke reports on workers’ experiences, we applied a narrative interview technique with 10 workers. To characterize the temporal transition of workers’ experiences, we distinguished between three phases in the deployment process: expectations before the deployment of the robots, familiarization with the robots, and experienced consequences of working with the robots. We present characteristic experiences of each phase and describe how these experiences change over time regarding the perceived functional value of the robots, work organization, feelings, social environment, and attitudes. Overall, our research contributes leverage points towards a more positive experience of workers when deploying robots in a factory.

[1]  Virpi Roto,et al.  UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[2]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Towards a methodology for longitudinal evaluation of social robotic telepresence for elderly , 2011, HRI 2011.

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing for long-term human-robot interaction and application to weight loss , 2008 .

[4]  Sara Ljungblad,et al.  How do you play with a robotic toy animal?: a long-term study of Pleo , 2010, IDC.

[5]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Living with a Vacuum Cleaning Robot , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[6]  John Zimmerman,et al.  User experience over time: an initial framework , 2009, CHI.

[7]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue , 2010, Experience-Centered Design.

[8]  Karen Renaud,et al.  Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study , 2008, SAICSIT '08.

[9]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task , 2004 .

[10]  Evangelos Karapanos,et al.  Reconstructing experiences with iScale , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  THE WAY I SEE ITMemory is more important than actuality , 2009, INTR.

[12]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  Social robotic telepresence , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Characteristics of narrative textual data linked to user experiences , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Thedy Yogasara,et al.  Anticipated user experience in the early stages of product development , 2014 .

[15]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Exploring human-robot cooperation possibilities for semiconductor manufacturing , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[16]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[17]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  User Experience Research in the Semiconductor Factory: A Contradiction? , 2011, INTERACT.

[18]  Sari Kujala,et al.  Emotions, experiences and usability in real-life mobile phone use , 2013, CHI.

[19]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Robots in Time: How User Experience in Human-Robot Interaction Changes over Time , 2013, ICSR.

[20]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[21]  Thomas Olsson,et al.  Layers of user expectations of future technologies: an early framework , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[23]  Petra Björndal,et al.  On the handling of impedance factors for establishing apprenticeship relations during field studies in industry domains , 2014, NordiCHI.

[24]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience , 2011, CHI.

[25]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Lauralee Alben,et al.  Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design , 1996, INTR.

[27]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Research in the semiconductor factory: Insights into experiences and contextual influences , 2014, 2014 7th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI).

[28]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Looking Forward to a “Robotic Society”? , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.