How lingering representations of abandoned context words affect speech production.

Four experiments tested whether and how initially planned but then abandoned speech can influence the production of a subsequent resumption. Participants named initial pictures, which were sometimes suddenly replaced by target pictures that were related in meaning or word form or were unrelated. They then had to stop and resume with the name of the target picture. Target picture naming latencies were measured separately for trials in which the initial speech was skipped, interrupted, or completed. Semantically related initial pictures helped the production of the target word, although the effect dissipated once the utterance of the initial picture name had been completed. In contrast, phonologically related initial pictures hindered the production of the target word, but only for trials in which the name of the initial picture had at least partly been uttered. This semantic facilitation and phonological interference did not depend on the time interval between the initial and target picture, which was either varied between 200 ms and 400 ms (Experiments 1-2) or was kept constant at 300 ms (Experiments 3-4). We discuss the implications of these results for models of speech self-monitoring and for models of problem-free word production.

[1]  S. G. Nooteboom,et al.  Speaking and unspeaking : detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech , 1980 .

[2]  T. Gale,et al.  Category-Specific Naming and the ‘Visual’ Characteristics of Line Drawn Stimuli , 2002, Cortex.

[3]  Victor S Ferreira,et al.  Proactive interference effects on sentence production , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  A. Cutler,et al.  Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon , 1977 .

[5]  Linda Wheeldon,et al.  Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production , 2003 .

[6]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[7]  H. Storkel,et al.  Reprogramming phonologically similar utterances: the role of phonetic features in pre-motor encoding. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Deciding where to stop speaking , 2011 .

[9]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984 .

[10]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[12]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[13]  Peter A. Starreveld,et al.  On the Interpretation of Onsets of Auditory Context Effects in Word Production , 2000 .

[14]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Attention, temporal predictability, and the time course of context effects in naming performance. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[15]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture–word interference task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[17]  H. Kolk,et al.  The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[19]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[20]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[22]  Claus-W. Wallesch,et al.  Errors and their Relevance for Models of Language Production , 1993 .

[23]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Error Monitoring in Speech Production: A Computational Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  G. Dell,et al.  Syllable Structure in Speech Production: Are Syllables Chunks or Schemas? , 1995 .

[25]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[27]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Michael P. Sullivan,et al.  The Nature of Phonological Encoding During Spoken Word Retrieval , 1999 .

[29]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical and Phonological Influences on Word Order , 2009, Psychological science.

[30]  W. Levelt,et al.  Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words , 2001, Cognition.

[31]  A. Meyer,et al.  Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  S Brédart Word interruption in self-repairing , 1991, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[33]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical Selection is Not a Competitive Process: A Reply to La Heij et al. (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[34]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[35]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[37]  Sylvia A. A. Van Den Boogaard,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access , 2004 .

[38]  G. Dell,et al.  The sequential cuing effect in speech production , 1994, Cognition.

[39]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Albert Costa,et al.  The Distractor Picture Paradox in Speech Production: Evidence from the Word Translation Task , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Concurrent processing of words and their replacements during speech , 2008, Cognition.

[42]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Lingering effects of disfluent material on comprehension of garden path sentences , 2005 .

[44]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling , 2005 .

[46]  Carolyn E Wilshire,et al.  Serial order in phonological encoding: an exploration of the `word onset effect' using laboratory-induced errors , 1998, Cognition.

[47]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999 .

[48]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. , 1991 .

[49]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue , 1975 .

[50]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  A Critique of Top-down Independent Levels Models of Speech Production: Evidence from Non-plan-Internal Speech Errors , 1984, Cogn. Sci..