Digital Trust Games: An Experimental Study

An experimental study of the digital trust game in [2] is presented. The study consists of an initial survey followed by a four-part dynamic experiment investigating various aspects of digital trust decisions. Digital trust in online environments differs from its offline variants due to its unique characteristics such as near instantaneous communication, transient and impersonal nature of interactions, immediate access to opinions of others, and availability of high amount of (but often low quality) information. It is observed that while the game theory provides a suitable analytical framework for quantitative analysis of digital trust decisions, the model in [2] has its shortcomings. Firstly, the subjects do not seem to adopt an iterative best or gradient response strategy. They exhibit significant (mental) inertia and only respond to new information or significant situation changes. Secondly, they take into account signals from their social circle much more than aggregate signals such as average scores. Both of these results and additional insights gained have important implications for future game theoretic modeling efforts of digital trust.

[1]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Joint Strategy Fictitious Play with Inertia for Potential Games , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  M. Mcluhan.  The Medium Is the Massage , 1967 .

[3]  Jim Engle-Warnick,et al.  Inferring repeated-game strategies from actions: evidence from trust game experiments , 2006 .

[4]  Douglas W. Hubbard,et al.  How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of "Intangibles" in Business , 2007 .

[5]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system , 2002, The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce.

[6]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Jim Engle-Warnick,et al.  The evolution of strategies in a repeated trust game , 2004 .

[8]  Karl Aberer,et al.  P2P reputation management: Probabilistic estimation vs. social networks , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[9]  Paul Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2002 .

[10]  S. Quartz,et al.  Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange , 2005, Science.

[11]  Tansu Alpcan,et al.  Network Security , 2010 .

[12]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental study of the repeated trust game with incomplete information , 2002 .

[13]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[14]  Tansu Alpcan,et al.  A game theoretic model for digital identity and trust in online communities , 2010, ASIACCS '10.

[15]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Trust Modeling and Management: From Social Trust to Digital Trust , 2008 .

[17]  R. Subramanian.  Computer Security, Privacy and Politics: Current Issues, Challenges and Solutions , 2008 .

[18]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..