Cumulation and flexibi l - ity with infusions o f neuromuscular blocking drug s

HE major problem addressed in neuro muscular research over the past 60 yr ha s been to provide a fast onset/rapid recover y nondepolarizing agent without side effects . The driving force behind this agenda is a patient saf e ty problem, that is the possibility to secure the airwa y within 1-1.5 min and a rapid (5-10 min) recover y should intubation fail. This quest for new agents ha s not produced the perfect drug, but over the pas t decades, a trend towards faster onset, shorter duration compounds can be observed . The availability of short acting neuromuscular block ers has another benefit quite separate from the rapid on/off property. It allows the clinician to increase o r decrease rapidly the intensity of surgical relaxation , depending on actual need, and this is best accomplished when neuromuscular blocking drugs are given as infu sions. The depth of anesthesia required for a given su rgical procedure is not constant. The need for muscl e relaxation also varies throughout surgery. It is probabl y highest at the time of tracheal intubation, is moderat e at peritoneal incision and closure, and lowest at skin closure. These rough guidelines depend on the patien t and the procedure. Infusions aside, anesthesiologist s commonly inject neuromuscular relaxants according to need. A relatively large dose is given at the beginning for tracheal intubation, with no response seen at th e adductor pollicis with indirect nerve stimulation. A somewhat more modest level of relaxation is needed fo r the start of the surgery, less relaxation is usually presen t for most of the procedure, and top-up doses are often needed for closure. Full recovery is a must at the end o f the case . Provided that recovery is rapid, there is, however , very little disadvantage in keeping relaxation relativel y constant at a deep level throughout surgery. Most mod ern neuromuscular relaxants have virtually no cardio vascular effects, so an overdose has few, if any, immed i ate consequences. This is not the case for narcotics , inhalational agents and intravenous anesthetics, all o f which produce hypotension if a large dose is admini stered. Moreover, the dose of muscle relaxant can b e adjusted by using a nerve stimulator. Thus, an attractiv e solution for the administration of muscle relaxants is b y infusion, adjusted to fit most requirements during th e case (usually one twitch in the train-of-four). The basi c properties of the perfect neuromuscular blocking drug for administration by infusion can be imagined easily : (1) fast onset to have the option to increase relaxation quickly if required; (2) rapid recovery because neuro muscular function must return to normal after anesth e sia; and (3) constant infusion rate to keep the effec t constant with time. The first two of these properties ar e part of what is considered essential for an ideal neuro muscular blocking drug. In addition, a constant infu sion rate allows profound relaxation without concern for recovery, with the anesthesiologist’s attention

[1]  J. Proost,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-dynamic relationship between rapacuronium (Org 9487) and its 3-desacetyl metabolite (Org 9488). , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  N. Goudsouzian,et al.  Prolonged mivacurium infusion in young and elderly adults , 1997 .

[3]  L. Radbruch,et al.  A Comparison of Cisatracurium and Atracurium: Onset of Neuromuscular Block After Bolus Injection and Recovery After Subsequent Infusion , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  C. Lien,et al.  The Clinical Neuromuscular Pharmacology of 51W89 in Patients Receiving Nitrous Oxide/Opioid/Barbiturate Anesthesia , 1995, Anesthesiology.

[5]  R. Mirakhur,et al.  Administration of rocuronium (Org 9426) by continuous infusion and its reversibility with anticholinesterases , 1994, Anaesthesia.

[6]  J. Proost,et al.  Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of an infusion of Org 9487, a new short-acting steroidal neuromuscular blocking agent. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  C. Lien,et al.  The Phamtacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Stereoisomers of Mivacurium in Patients Receiving Nitrous Oxide/Opioid/Barbiturate Anesthesia , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[8]  F. Donati,et al.  Pharmacodynamic behaviour of rocuronium in the elderly , 1993, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[9]  R. Martineau,et al.  Cumulation and reversal with prolonged infusions of atracurium and vecuronium , 1992, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[10]  S. Grond,et al.  Atracurium and Vecuronium: Repeated Bolus Injection Versus Infusion , 1992, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  W. Buzello,et al.  Mivacurium: Dose‐Response Relationship and Administration by Repeated Injection or Infusion , 1992, Anesthesia and analgesia.