Children's Creativity Lab: Creating a 'Pen of the Future'

Technology is changing the way we acquire new skills and proficiencies and handwriting is no exception to this. However, while some technological advances exist in this area, the question of how we can digitally enhance the process of learning handwriting remains under-explored. Being immersed in this process on an everyday basis, we believe that school aged children can provide valuable ideas and insights into the design of future writing tools for learners developing their (hand)writing skills. As end-users of the proposed technology, we explore including children in a form of informed participatory design during a Creativity Lab where we invited 12 children, aged 11--12, to put themselves into the shoes of a product designer and create a Pen of the Future using prototyping materials. In this paper we describe our methodology and discuss the design ideas that children came up with and how these may inform the design of future writing tools.

[1]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Sampling young children's experiences with cultural probes , 2008, IDC.

[2]  Allison Druin,et al.  The Role of Children in the Design Technology , 1999 .

[3]  E. Gentaz,et al.  Haptics in teaching handwriting: the role of perceptual and visuo-motor skills. , 2011, Human movement science.

[4]  Pierre David Wellner,et al.  Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk , 1993, CACM.

[5]  J. Case-Smith,et al.  Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. , 1996, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[6]  Tom Chau,et al.  On the development of a computer-based handwriting assessment tool to objectively quantify handwriting proficiency in children , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[7]  Allison Druin,et al.  Brownies or bags-of-stuff?: domain expertise in cooperative inquiry with children , 2013, IDC.

[8]  Niels Henze,et al.  Analysis of children's handwriting on touchscreen phones , 2013, MobileHCI '13.

[9]  Uta Hinrichs,et al.  Digital Pen Technology’s Suitability to Support Handwriting Learning , 2015 .

[10]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  Design for inspiration: children, personal connections and educational technology , 2006, OZCHI '06.

[11]  Afke Donker,et al.  Usability testing with young children , 2004, IDC '04.

[12]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Tangible paper interfaces: interpreting pupils' manipulations , 2012, ITS.

[13]  Allison Druin,et al.  Working with young children as technology design partners , 2005, CACM.

[14]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Measuring the Usability of Text Input Methods for Children , 2001, BCS HCI/IHM.

[15]  Susanne Lindberg,et al.  Participatory design workshops with children with cancer: lessons learned , 2013, IDC.

[16]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  First steps in the FabLab: experiences engaging children , 2012, OZCHI.

[17]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Quiet interfaces that help students think , 2006, UIST.

[18]  Florence Bara,et al.  A Visuo-Haptic Device - Telemaque - Increases Kindergarten Children's Handwriting Acquisition , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[19]  J.C. Read.  Children using Digital Ink for Writing , 2007, First International Workshop on Pen-Based Learning Technologies (PLT 2007).

[20]  Julie Maitland,et al.  Bridging the information gap: collaborative technology design with low-income at-risk families to engender healthy behaviors , 2009, OZCHI.

[21]  Ahmed Sabbir Arif,et al.  A comparative evaluation of touch and pen gestures for adult and child users , 2013, IDC.

[22]  Elisa Rubegni,et al.  Design guidelines for more engaging electronic books: insights from a cooperative inquiry study , 2014, IDC.

[23]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Demonstrating CobWeb – An Innovative Writing Environment for Children , 2004 .

[24]  S. Rosenblum,et al.  Product and Process Evaluation of Handwriting Difficulties , 2003 .

[25]  C. S. Green,et al.  Children, Wired: For Better and for Worse , 2010, Neuron.

[26]  Andrew Large,et al.  “Bonded design”: A novel approach to intergenerational information technology design , 2006 .