Write-error rate of nanoscale magnetic tunnel junctions in the precessional regime

We investigate the write-error rate (WER) of spin-transfer torque (STT)-induced switching in nanoscale magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) for various pulse durations down to 3 ns. While the pulse duration dependence of switching current density shows a typical behavior of the precessional regime, WER vs current density is not described by an analytical solution known for the precessional regime. The measurement of WER as a function of magnetic field suggests that the WER is characterized by an effective damping constant, which is significantly larger than the value determined by ferromagnetic resonance. The current density dependence of WER is well reproduced by a macrospin model with thermal fluctuation using the effective damping constant. The obtained finding implies a larger relaxation rate and/or thermal agitation during STT switching, offering a previously unknown insight toward high-reliability memory applications.We investigate the write-error rate (WER) of spin-transfer torque (STT)-induced switching in nanoscale magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) for various pulse durations down to 3 ns. While the pulse duration dependence of switching current density shows a typical behavior of the precessional regime, WER vs current density is not described by an analytical solution known for the precessional regime. The measurement of WER as a function of magnetic field suggests that the WER is characterized by an effective damping constant, which is significantly larger than the value determined by ferromagnetic resonance. The current density dependence of WER is well reproduced by a macrospin model with thermal fluctuation using the effective damping constant. The obtained finding implies a larger relaxation rate and/or thermal agitation during STT switching, offering a previously unknown insight toward high-reliability memory applications.

[1]  H. Ohno,et al.  Free-layer size dependence of anisotropy field in nanoscale CoFeB/MgO magnetic tunnel junctions , 2018 .

[2]  M. Pufall,et al.  Magnetic damping in sputter-deposited C o 2 MnGe Heusler compounds with A 2 , B 2 , and L 2 1 orders: Experiment and theory , 2018 .

[3]  Sze Ter Lim,et al.  Magnetization dynamics and its scattering mechanism in thin CoFeB films with interfacial anisotropy , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  V. Nikitin,et al.  Material Developments and Domain Wall-Based Nanosecond-Scale Switching Process in Perpendicularly Magnetized STT-MRAM Cells , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[5]  T. Silva,et al.  Magnetic properties in ultrathin 3d transition-metal binary alloys. II. Experimental verification of quantitative theories of damping and spin pumping , 2017, 1701.02475.

[6]  T. Devolder,et al.  Size dependence of nanosecond-scale spin-torque switching in perpendicularly magnetized tunnel junctions , 2016, 1607.00260.

[7]  Jeong-Heon Park,et al.  Dependence of Voltage and Size on Write Error Rates in Spin-Transfer Torque Magnetic Random-Access Memory , 2016, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[8]  H. Ohno,et al.  Ferromagnetic resonance in nanoscale CoFeB/MgO magnetic tunnel junctions , 2015 .

[9]  Shoji Ikeda,et al.  Properties of magnetic tunnel junctions with a MgO/CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB/MgO recording structure down to junction diameter of 11 nm , 2014 .

[10]  J. Katine,et al.  Dynamics of spin torque switching in all-perpendicular spin valve nanopillars , 2014 .

[11]  Eric E. Fullerton,et al.  Domain wall motion in nanopillar spin-valves with perpendicular anisotropy driven by spin-transfer torques , 2012 .

[12]  Michael Marthaler,et al.  Spin torque switching of an in-plane magnetized system in a thermally activated region , 2012, 1211.5818.

[13]  Tom Zhong,et al.  High Spin Torque Efficiency of Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with MgO/CoFeB/MgO Free Layer , 2012 .

[14]  H. Ohno,et al.  Current-induced torques in magnetic materials. , 2012, Nature materials.

[15]  Hitoshi Kubota,et al.  Electric-field-induced ferromagnetic resonance excitation in an ultrathin ferromagnetic metal layer , 2012, Nature Physics.

[16]  W. Rippard,et al.  Switching Distributions for Perpendicular Spin-Torque Devices Within the Macrospin Approximation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  R. P. Robertazzi,et al.  Effect of subvolume excitation and spin-torque efficiency on magnetic switching , 2011 .

[18]  W J Gallagher,et al.  Demonstration of Ultralow Bit Error Rates for Spin-Torque Magnetic Random-Access Memory With Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy , 2011, IEEE Magnetics Letters.

[19]  H. Ohno,et al.  A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction. , 2010, Nature materials.

[20]  Jiang Xiao,et al.  Theory of magnon-driven spin Seebeck effect , 2010, 1009.0318.

[21]  J. Katine,et al.  Time-resolved reversal of spin-transfer switching in a nanomagnet. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[22]  R. Arias,et al.  Extrinsic contributions to the ferromagnetic resonance response of ultrathin films , 1999 .

[23]  Berger.  Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[24]  J. Slonczewski.  Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers , 1996 .

[25]  J. W. Brown.  Thermal Fluctuations of a Single-Domain Particle , 1963 .

[26]  Avik W. Ghosh,et al.  Fokker—Planck Study of Parameter Dependence on Write Error Slope in Spin-Torque Switching , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[27]  H. Ohno,et al.  Damping constant in a free layer in nanoscale CoFeB/MgO magnetic tunnel junctions investigated by homodyne-detected ferromagnetic resonance , 2016 .