Associations of breed and feeding management with milk production curves at herd level using a random regression test-day model.

Earlier studies identified large between-herd variation in estimated lactation curve parameters from test-day milk yield and milk composition records collected in Ragusa province, Italy. The objective of this study was to identify sources of variation able to explain these between-herd differences in milk production curves, by estimating associations of animal breed (Holstein Friesian vs. Brown Swiss), feeding system [separate feeding (SF) vs. total mixed ration (TMR)], and TMR chemical composition on milk and milk components herd curves. Data recorded from 1992 through 2007 for test-day (TD) milk, fat, and protein yields from 1,287,019 records of 148,951 lactations of 51,489 cows in 427 herds were processed using a random regression TD model. Random herd curves (HCUR) for milk, fat, and protein yields were estimated from the model per herd, year, and parity (1, 2, and 3+) using 4-order Legendre polynomials. From March 2006 through December 2007, samples of TMR were collected every 3 mo from 37 farms in Ragusa province. Samples were analyzed for dry matter, ash, crude protein, soluble nitrogen, acid detergent lignin, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and starch. Traits used to describe milk production curves were peak, days in milk at peak, persistency, and mean. Association of feeding system and animal breed with HCUR traits was investigated using a general mixed model procedure. Association of TMR chemical composition with HCUR traits was investigated using multivariate analysis with regression and stepwise model selection. Results were consistent for all traits and parities. Feeding system was significantly associated with HCUR peak and mean, with higher values for TMR. Animal breed was significantly associated with HCUR persistency, with higher values for Brown Swiss herds. Furthermore, animal breed influenced HCUR peak and mean, with higher values for Holstein Friesian herds. Crude protein had the largest effect on HCUR peak and mean, whereas the interaction between crude protein and dry matter mainly affected persistency. When provided by a national evaluation system, HCUR can be used as an indicator of herd feeding management.

[1]  D. C. Patterson,et al.  Effect of dietary protein content on animal production and blood metabolites of dairy cows during lactation. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  K. Pierce,et al.  Effects of breed and feeding system on milk production, body weight, body condition score, reproductive performance, and postpartum ovarian function. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  C. Dechow,et al.  Milk, fat, protein, somatic cell score, and days open among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and their crosses. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  J. P. Frost,et al.  Dairy cow performance and labour inputs associated with two silage feeding systems , 2006 .

[6]  A. D. de Roos,et al.  Random herd curves in a test-day model for milk, fat, and protein production of dairy cattle in The Netherlands. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  N. Gengler,et al.  Prediction of daily milk, fat, and protein production by a random regression test-day model. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  H. Khalili,et al.  Effects of concentrate feeding strategy on the performance of dairy cows housed in a free stall barn , 2003 .

[9]  G. Broderick,et al.  Effects of varying dietary protein and energy levels on the production of lactating dairy cows. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  G. Kistemaker Comparison of persistency definitions in random regression test day models , 2003 .

[11]  L. D. Muller,et al.  Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  Z. Wu,et al.  Milk production during the complete lactation of dairy cows fed diets containing different amounts of protein. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Prediction of daily milk yields from a limited number of test days using test day models. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  J. B. Holter,et al.  Predicting ad libitum dry matter intake and yield of Holstein cows. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  M. Cecava,et al.  Influence of source and amount of dietary protein on milk yield by cows in early lactation. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  Giuseppe Licitra,et al.  Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds , 1996 .

[17]  D. C. Patterson,et al.  The influence of genetic index for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding and the utilization of energy and nitrogen , 1995 .

[18]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. , 1990, Genetics.

[20]  Kenneth Helrick,et al.  Official methods of analysis , 1990 .

[21]  W. Horwitz Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[22]  C. Coppock Feeding Methods and Grouping Systems , 1977 .

[23]  G. W. Brandt,et al.  Production of milk and milk constituents by Brown Swiss, Holsteins, and their crossbreds , 1974 .

[24]  H. Goering,et al.  Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, prcedures, and some applications) , 1970 .

[25]  B. Mcdaniel,et al.  Interbreed Matings in Dairy Cattle. III. Economic Aspects , 1968 .

[26]  B. Mcdaniel,et al.  Interbreed Matings in Dairy Cattle. I. Yield Traits, Feed Efficiency, Type and Rate of Milking , 1968 .