The impact of problem size on decision processes: an experimental investigation on very large choice problems with support of decision support systems

Abstract: Choice problems as a class of decision problems have attracted great attention for the last couple of decades. Among the frameworks and supporting theories used in their study, two have had the greatest impact: bounded rationality and cost–benefit. Both theories could find support from past empirical studies under different conditions or problem environments. In the past studies, problem size has been shown to play an important role in decision-making. As problem size increases, a decision process may be detoured and the decision outcome may be different. In this paper we investigate the impact of problem size on three important aspects of the computer-aided decision process – strategy selection, decision time/effort, and decision quality – through very large choice problems.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids on Decision Making Strategies , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[3]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The influence of decision aids on choice strategies under conditions of high cognitive load , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice , 1990 .

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought , 1978 .

[7]  J.W. Payne,et al.  Understanding contingent choice: a computer simulation approach , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[8]  Jean C. Bedard,et al.  The Effects of Task Size and Similarity on the Decision Behavior of Bank Loan Officers , 1985 .

[9]  Pai-Cheng Chu,et al.  The Joint Effects of Effort and Quality on Decision Strategy Choice with Computerized Decision Aids , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[10]  O. Svenson Process descriptions of decision making. , 1979 .

[11]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[12]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Directed and Nondirected Change , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[14]  P. C. Chu,et al.  Does Time Constraint on Users Negate the Efficacy of Decision Support Systems? , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[15]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[16]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[18]  E. Spires,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Choice Behavior and Use of Decision Aids: A Comparison of Japan and the United States. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[19]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Influence of Decision Aids on Choice Strategies: An Experimental Analysis of the Role of Cognitive Effort , 1994 .

[20]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[21]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .