Development and pilot testing of a kneeling ultralight wheelchair design

“Dynamic wheeled mobility” offers “on the fly” seating adjustments for wheelchair users such that various activities performed throughout the day can be matched by an appropriate seat position. While this has benefits for user participation and health, the added weight in existing dynamic wheelchairs may impact the user's ability to transport the frame, e.g. into cars. Other dynamic features to enable more participation avenues are also desirable. This paper outlines the development of a “kneeling” ultralight wheelchair design that offers dynamic wheeled mobility functionality at a weight that is comparable to many existing ultralight wheelchairs. In addition, the wheelchair's kneeling function allows a lowered seat position to facilitate low-to-the-ground tasks such as floor transfers and other activities where sustained low level reaching may be required (e.g. playing with children, changing a tire, etc.). This paper also describes the development and pilot testing of an end user evaluation protocol designed to validate the wheelchair's functionality and performance. Successful realization and commercialization of the technology would offer a novel product choice for people with mobility disabilities, and that may support daily activities, health, improved quality of life, and greater participation in the community.

[1]  M. M. DiGiovine,et al.  User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Joy Wee,et al.  Factors affecting measures of activities and participation in persons with mobility impairment , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  Barry S Mason,et al.  Influence of Glove Type on Mobility Performance for Wheelchair Rugby Players , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  Jaimie F. Borisoff,et al.  The development of an ultralight wheelchair with dynamic seating , 2011 .

[5]  M. Jannink,et al.  Effects of dynamic sitting interventions on tissue oxygenation in individuals with spinal cord disorders , 2010, Spinal Cord.

[6]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  Engineering Better Wheelchairs to Enhance Community Participation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Dan Ding,et al.  Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Manual Wheelchair Use: Bouts of Mobility in Everyday Life , 2012, Rehabilitation research and practice.

[9]  Julianna Arva,et al.  RESNA Position on the Application of Seat-Elevating Devices for Wheelchair Users , 2009, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[10]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  A Dynamic Seating Intervention for Wheelchair Seating Discomfort , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[11]  Angeliki Perdios,et al.  Effects of camber on wheeling efficiency in the experienced and inexperienced wheelchair user. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  Louise Demers,et al.  The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress , 2002 .

[13]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  Most essential wheeled mobility skills for daily life: an international survey among paralympic wheelchair athletes with spinal cord injury. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  Evaluation of titanium ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI/ RESNA standards. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  Rosemarie Cooper,et al.  RESNA Position on the Application of Tilt, Recline, and Elevating Legrests for Wheelchairs , 2009, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.