Utilization of a Glucometer Test Strip and Enzymatic Reactions to Quantify Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD IgG Antibody and SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Saliva and Serum

A sensor capable of quantifying both anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody levels and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus in saliva and serum was developed. This was accomplished by exploiting the enzymatic reaction of maltose and orthophosphate (PO43–) in the presence of maltose phosphorylase to generate an equivalent amount of glucose that was detected using a commercial glucometer test strip and a potentiostat. Important for this approach is the ability to generate PO43– in an amount that is directly related to the concentration of the analytes. RBD-modified magnetic microparticles were used to capture anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD antibodies, while particles modified with anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies were used to capture SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein from inactivated virus samples. A magnet was used to isolate and purify the magnetic microparticles (with analyte attached), and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies were bound to the analytes attached to the respective magnetic microparticles. Finally, through enzymatic reactions, specific amounts of PO43– (and subsequently glucose) were generated in proportion to the analyte concentration, which was then quantified using a commercial glucometer test strip. Utilizing glucose test strips makes the sensor relatively inexpensive, with a cost per test of ∼US $7 and ∼US $12 for quantifying anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD antibody and SARS-CoV-2, respectively. Our sensor exhibited a limit of detection of 0.42 ng/mL for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD antibody, which is sensitive enough to quantify typical concentrations of antibodies in COVID-19-infected or vaccinated individuals (>1 μg/mL). The limit of detection for the SARS-CoV-2 virus is 300 pfu/mL (5.4 × 106 RNA copies/mL), which exceeds the performance recommended by the WHO (500 pfu/mL). In addition, the sensor exhibited good selectivity when challenged with competing analytes and could be used to quantify analytes in saliva and serum matrices with an accuracy of >94% compared to RT-qPCR.

[1]  Ting-Hsuan Chen,et al.  Microfluidic particle dam for direct visualization of SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in COVID-19 vaccinees , 2022, Science advances.

[2]  N. Tabatabaei,et al.  Rapid and Low-Cost Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titers of ICU Patients with Respiratory Deterioration Using a Handheld Thermo-Photonic Device , 2022, Biomedicines.

[3]  Stefani N. Thomas,et al.  Ultrasensitive detection of salivary SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in individuals with natural and COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Gaofeng Liang,et al.  A Simple and Universal Nucleic Acid Assay Platform Based on Personal Glucose Meter Using SARS-CoV-2 N Gene as the Model , 2022, Biosensors.

[5]  J. Vinjé,et al.  Development and Validation of an Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Salivary IgA and IgG , 2022, The Journal of Immunology.

[6]  E. Callaway Why does the Omicron sub-variant spread faster than the original? , 2022, Nature.

[7]  G. Dirani,et al.  Fast and real-time electrical transistor assay for quantifying SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies , 2022, Communications Materials.

[8]  M. Serpe,et al.  Orthophosphate Quantification in Water Utilizing an Enzymatic Reaction and a Commercial Glucometer Test Strip. , 2022, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  C. Welch,et al.  Quantitation of Trastuzumab and an Antibody to SARS-CoV-2 in Minutes Using Affinity Membranes in 96-Well Plates , 2022, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  F. Long,et al.  Rapid and quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody in serum using optofluidic point-of-care testing fluorescence biosensor , 2021, Talanta.

[11]  Xianjia Peng,et al.  Hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of metal sulfide particles as a determinator of aggregation performance in wastewater , 2021 .

[12]  Gheyath K Nasrallah,et al.  Evaluation of Antibody Response in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patients and Diagnostic Assessment of New IgM/IgG ELISA Kits , 2021, Pathogens.

[13]  Y. Xiang,et al.  Characterization of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in COVID-19 patients reveals highly potent neutralizing IgA , 2021, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[14]  A. Öpik,et al.  Development of a portable MIP-based electrochemical sensor for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen , 2021, Biosensors and Bioelectronics.

[15]  A. Sette,et al.  Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 , 2021, Cell.

[16]  C. Day,et al.  Antibodies to neutralising epitopes synergistically block the interaction of the receptor‐binding domain of SARS‐CoV‐2 to ACE 2 , 2021, Clinical & translational immunology.

[17]  Qianghu Wang,et al.  Dynamic changes in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies during SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery from COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Communications.

[18]  A. Gingras,et al.  Persistence of serum and saliva antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens in COVID-19 patients , 2020, Science Immunology.

[19]  Michael D Healy,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 viral load is associated with increased disease severity and mortality , 2020, Nature Communications.

[20]  Patricia Harrington,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity over the course of an infection , 2020, Journal of Infection.

[21]  Jun Zhou,et al.  One-step rapid quantification of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles via low-cost nanoplasmonic sensors in generic microplate reader and point-of-care device , 2020, bioRxiv.

[22]  Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) , 2018, The Grants Register 2022.

[23]  J. Lammertyn,et al.  Evaluation of different strategies for magnetic particle functionalization with DNA aptamers. , 2016, New biotechnology.

[24]  M. Meyerhoff,et al.  Evaluation of commercial glucometer test strips for potential measurement of glucose in tears. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  Zhi Zhu,et al.  Target-responsive "sweet" hydrogel with glucometer readout for portable and quantitative detection of non-glucose targets. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  Yi Lu,et al.  Using personal glucose meters and functional DNA sensors to quantify a variety of analytical targets. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[27]  M. Marinaro,et al.  Detection of Caprine Herpesvirus 1–Specific Antibodies in Goat Sera Using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Serum Neutralization Test , 2010, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[28]  Nigel A. Surridge,et al.  The Technology Behind Glucose Meters: Test Strips , 2008 .

[29]  H. Moon,et al.  Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with serum neutralization test for serodiagnosis of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection. , 2005, Journal of veterinary science.

[30]  P. Gibbs,et al.  Separation and detection of salmonellae using immunomagnetic particles , 1991 .

[31]  T. Fukui,et al.  Purification and Properties of Maltose Phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis , 1973 .

[32]  Simon D Tran,et al.  Saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral and systemic diseases. , 2016, Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research.

[33]  D. Mader Reptile medicine and surgery , 1996 .