Lamb waves beam deviation due to small inclination of the test structure in air-coupled ultrasonic NDT.

In Lamb waves inspection, an air-coupled transmitter transducer is oriented at a specific angle such that it generates a pure Lamb mode which propagates along the structure and interacts with any existing defects. For this inspection system, amplitude losses appears when small inclinations of the tested structure occurs. An important factor which affects directly these losses has been observed, it consists of the Lamb waves beam (LWB) deviation due to this bad alignment. In this work, a simple expression of LWB deviation has been deduced. This expression includes the test structure angle, phase velocity of generated Lamb mode, and the phase velocity of waves propagating in the coupled medium. A(0) Lamb mode is generated and detected in 1 mm thick aluminium plate sample using 1 MHz PZ27 piezoelectric transducers of 20 mm of diameter. Experimental LWB deviation angles are measured for different inclination angles of the test sample. A comparative study is released with theoretical results. For 1 degree of misalignment in the aluminium plate inclination, and transducers separation distance of 35 mm, LWB deviation angle is around 7 degrees and the amplitude is reduced by around 11%. Then, for a large separation distance, we must move the receiver transducer to detect the deviated LWB. It is shown that, for both theoretical and experimental studies, the LWB deviation and its measured amplitude are very sensitive to the alignment of the tested structure with respect to the transmitter-receiver transducers plane. In metal plates it is most satisfactory to use A(0) mode compared with S(0) mode since it is easy to excite and has a large amplitude and small deviation beam angles.

[1]  D. A. Hutchins,et al.  Advances in non-contact and air-coupled transducers [US materials inspection] , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[2]  Jordi Salazar,et al.  High-power high-resolution pulser for air-coupled ultrasonic NDE applications , 2003, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[3]  T.E. Gomez,et al.  Bridging the gap of impedance mismatch between air and solid materials , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[4]  F. Livingstone,et al.  Review of progress in quantitative NDE: Williamsburg, VA, USA, 21–26 June 1987 , 1988 .

[5]  W. E. Lawrie,et al.  Ultrasonic testing of materials: 2nd English Edition, translated from the 3rd German Edition, J. & H. Krautkrämer Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1977) 667 pp, $65.20, DM 148 , 1978 .

[6]  G. Hayward,et al.  Applications of through-air ultrasound for rapid NDE scanning in the aerospace industry , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Surface micromachined capacitive ultrasonic transducers , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  D. Schindel,et al.  Applications of micromachined capacitance transducers in air-coupled ultrasonics and nondestructive evaluation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Adrian D. Jones,et al.  Novel, wide bandwidth, micromachined ultrasonic transducers , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  M. J. Garcia-Hernandez,et al.  Ultra-low noise front-end electronics for air-coupled ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation , 2003 .

[11]  M. J. Garcia-Hernandez,et al.  Designing amplifiers with very low output noise for high impedance piezoelectric transducers , 2005 .

[12]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Optimization of lamb wave inspection techniques , 1992 .