Nomograms including nuclear matrix protein 22 for prediction of disease recurrence and progression in patients with Ta, T1 or CIS transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

PURPOSE We developed and validated nomograms that accurately predict disease recurrence and progression in patients with Ta, T1, or CIS transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder using a large international cohort. METHODS Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models targeted histologically confirmed disease recurrence, and focused on 2,542 patients with bladder TCC from 10 participating centers. Variables consisted of pre-cystoscopy voided urine Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 (NMP22) assay, urine cytology, age and gender. Resulting nomograms were internally validated with bootstrapping. Nomogram performance was explored graphically with Loess smoothing plots. RESULTS Overall 957 patients had recurrent TCC. Tumor grade and stage was available for 898 patients, including 24% grade I, 43% grade II, and 33% grade III; 45% stage Ta, 32% T1 and/or CIS, and 23% T2 or greater. Bootstrap corrected predictive accuracy for any TCC recurrence was 0.842; grade III Ta/T1 or CIS was 0.869; and T2 or higher stage TCC of any grade was 0.858. Virtually perfect performance characteristics were observed for the nomograms predicting any TCC recurrence or grade III Ta/T1 or CIS. The nomogram predicting T2 or higher stage TCC overestimated the observed probability for predicted values greater than 45%. CONCLUSIONS We developed and internally validated nomograms that incorporate urinary NMP22, cytology, age and gender to predict with high accuracy the probability of disease recurrence and progression in patients with Ta, T1, and/or CIS bladder TCC. These nomograms could provide a means for individualizing followup in patients with Ta, T1, CIS bladder TCC.

[1]  S. Loening,et al.  Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. , 1983, The Journal of urology.

[2]  C. Roehrborn,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of commonly available bladder tumor markers versus cytology: results of a comprehensive literature review and meta-analyses. , 2003, Urology.

[3]  T. Gasser,et al.  The addition of urinary urokinase-type plasminogen activator to urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 and cytology improves the detection of bladder cancer. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[4]  A. Sagalowsky,et al.  Risk stratification for bladder tumor recurrence, stage and grade by urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 and cytology. , 2004, European urology.

[5]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  The addition of interleukin-6 soluble receptor and transforming growth factor beta1 improves a preoperative nomogram for predicting biochemical progression in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  E. Messing,et al.  Use of a new tumor marker, urinary NMP22, in the detection of occult or rapidly recurring transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract following surgical treatment. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[7]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  T. Gasser,et al.  Urinary level of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: experience with 130 patients with biopsy confirmed tumor. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[9]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1995 .

[10]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  The bootstrap estimate of standard error , 1993 .

[11]  V. Serretta,et al.  Urinary NMP22 for the detection of recurrence after transurethral resection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: experience on 137 patients. , 1999, Urology.

[12]  S. Cytron,et al.  Effects on pain and anxiety of patients viewing their cystoscopy in addition to a detailed explanation: a controlled study , 2003, BJU international.

[13]  G. Vooijs,et al.  Accuracy of urinary cytology in the diagnosis of primary and recurrent bladder cancer. , 1993, Acta cytologica.

[14]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Judging new markers by their ability to improve predictive accuracy. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  Mira,et al.  Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein 22 as a tumour marker in the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder , 1999, BJU international.

[16]  A. K. Agarwal,et al.  Exclusion criteria enhance the specificity and positive predictive value of NMP22 and BTA stat. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Pierre I Karakiewicz,et al.  International validation of a preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  H. Grossman,et al.  Evaluation of NMP22 in the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[19]  D. Lamm,et al.  Maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy for recurrent TA, T1 and carcinoma in situ transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a randomized Southwest Oncology Group Study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[20]  K Koiso,et al.  Urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 as a new marker for the screening of urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria , 1999, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[21]  Thomas M. Wheeler,et al.  A Preoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer , 1998 .

[22]  T. Gasser,et al.  Urine detection of survivin is a sensitive marker for the noninvasive diagnosis of bladder cancer. , 2004, The Journal of urology.