Developing and testing a measure of dyadic efficacy for married women with rheumatoid arthritis and their spouses.

OBJECTIVE Interpersonal relationships and self-efficacy have each been independently studied in the context of coping with chronic illness. To examine a new type of interpersonal efficacy in couples coping with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), we developed and tested new measures of perceptions of arthritis dyadic efficacy. We assessed both partners' perceptions of confidence about working together as a team to manage women's illness-related challenges. METHODS First, a 3-phase pilot study was conducted with interviews, expert review, and pretesting to develop items. Next, the psychometric properties of new measures were tested in 190 women with RA and their husbands. Exploratory analyses were conducted, Cronbach's alphas were calculated for each factor, and construct validity was examined with Pearson's correlations at baseline, 4-month, and 8-month followup. RESULTS Factor analyses yielded 3 factors in the wife and husband versions, assessing dyadic behaviors concerning arthritis problem solving and emotions, arthritis symptom management, and arthritis-related couple outcomes. All items loaded >0.60, Cronbach's alphas for all subscales were >0.88, and initial evidence of construct validity was demonstrated. Finally, the initial factor structure was replicated with additional exploratory factor analyses in the same sample at 4-month and 8-month followup. CONCLUSION Three short, reliable subscales resulted for couples coping with RA for use in interpersonal health research. These instruments facilitate viewing illness adaptation processes in a dyadic manner.

[1]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Social relationships and psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[2]  A. Bandura Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[3]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[4]  C. Taylor,et al.  Exercise testing to enhance wives' confidence in their husbands' cardiac capability soon after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  K. Lorig,et al.  Arthritis Self-Management Studies: A Twelve-Year Review , 1993, Health education quarterly.

[6]  Walter R. Schumm,et al.  Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. , 1986 .

[7]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[8]  J. Coyne,et al.  Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy , 1994 .

[9]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[10]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[11]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. Rohrbaugh,et al.  Beyond the "self" in self-efficacy: Spouse confidence predicts patient survival following heart failure. , 2004, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[13]  L. Kazis,et al.  AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[15]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[16]  T. Revenson,et al.  Rheumatic illness and relationships: Coping as a joint venture. , 2000 .

[17]  C. Carver,et al.  Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[18]  Robert W. Norton,et al.  Measuring marital quality, A critical look at the dependent variable , 1983 .

[19]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[20]  R. Chang,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  K. Lorig,et al.  Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. , 1989, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  C. J. Huberty,et al.  Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. , 1989 .

[23]  J. Cohen,et al.  Predictors of pain and functioning in arthritis , 1986 .

[24]  A Gibofsky,et al.  Social support as a double-edged sword: the relation of positive and problematic support to depression among rheumatoid arthritis patients. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[25]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.