Comparison of two binaural beamforming approaches for hearing aids

Beamforming algorithms in binaural hearing aids are crucial to improve speech understanding in background noise for hearing impaired persons. In this study, we compare and evaluate the performance of two recently proposed minimum variance (MV) beamforming approaches for binaural hearing aids. The binaural linearly constrained MV (BLCMV) beamformer applies linear constraints to maintain the target source and mitigate the interfering sources, taking into account the reverberant nature of sound propagation. The inequality constrained MV (ICMV) beamformer applies inequality constraints to maintain the target source and mitigate the interfering sources, utilizing estimates of the direction of arrivals (DOAs) of the target and interfering sources. The similarities and differences between these two approaches is discussed and the performance of both algorithms is evaluated using simulated data and using real-world recordings, particularly focusing on the robustness to estimation errors of the relative transfer functions (RTFs) and DOAs. The BLCMV achieves a good performance if the RTFs are accurately estimated while the ICMV shows a good robustness to DOA estimation errors.

[1]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Peter Vary,et al.  Dual-Channel Speech Enhancement by Superdirective Beamforming , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[3]  Stefan Ernst,et al.  Combination of two-channel spectral subtraction and adaptive wiener post-filtering for noise reduction and dereverberation , 1996, 1996 8th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1996).

[4]  Israel Cohen,et al.  Multichannel Eigenspace Beamforming in a Reverberant Noisy Environment With Multiple Interfering Speech Signals , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[5]  G. Fairbanks.  Voice and articulation drillbook , 1960 .

[6]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Reduced-bandwidth Multi-channel Wiener Filter based binaural noise reduction and localization cue preservation in binaural hearing aids , 2014, Signal Process..

[7]  Yôiti SUZUKI,et al.  New Design Method of a Binaural Microphone Array Using Multiple Constraints , 1999 .

[8]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Strategy-selective noise reduction for binaural digital hearing aids , 2003, Speech Commun..

[9]  P. Peterson,et al.  Intelligibility-weighted measures of speech-to-interference ratio and speech system performance. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Ehud Weinstein,et al.  Signal enhancement using beamforming and nonstationarity with applications to speech , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  Walter Kellermann,et al.  Speech enhancement for binaural hearing aids based on blind source separation , 2010, 2010 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).

[12]  Henning Puder,et al.  Binaural Signal Processing in Hearing Aids: Technologies and Algorithms , 2008 .

[13]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A real-world recording database for ad hoc microphone arrays , 2015, 2015 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA).

[14]  Sharon Gannot,et al.  The Binaural LCMV Beamformer and its Performance Analysis , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[15]  Sven Nordholm,et al.  Multichannel Signal Enhancement Algorithms for Assisted Listening Devices: Exploiting spatial diversity using multiple microphones , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[16]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Incorporating spatial information in binaural beamforming for noise suppression in hearing aids , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[17]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Image method for efficiently simulating small‐room acoustics , 1976 .

[18]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[19]  Sharon Gannot,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Linearly Constrained Multi-Channel Wiener Filtering Algorithms for Combined Noise Reduction and Binaural Cue Preservation in Binaural Hearing Aids , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[20]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[21]  Robert A Muenchen,et al.  Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[22]  G. Carter,et al.  The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay , 1976 .

[23]  Sharon Gannot,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Binaural Transfer Function MVDR Beamformers with Interference Cue Preservation Constraints , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[24]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Robustness analysis of multichannel Wiener filtering and generalized sidelobe cancellation for multimicrophone noise reduction in hearing aid applications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing.

[25]  Tao Zhang,et al.  An effective low complexity binaural beamforming algorithm for hearing aids , 2015, 2015 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA).

[26]  Sharon Gannot,et al.  Binaural Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance Beamformer for Hearing Aid Applications , 2012, IWAENC.

[27]  Fridolin P. Mechel,et al.  Scattering of Sound , 2004 .