An integrated MCDA software application for forest planning: a case study in southwestern Sweden

Forest planning in Sweden today translates not only into planning of timber production, but also for the provision of other functions and services. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods provide a way to take also non-monetary values into account in planning. The purpose of this study was to gain experience on how to use a forest decision support system combined with an MCDA tool in practical forestry. We used a new forest planning tool, PlanWise, which includes an integrated MCDA module, PlanEval. Using the software, the decision maker can compare different forest plans and evaluate them against his/her objectives in a structured and analytical manner. The analysis thus provides a ranking of the alternatives based on the individual preferences of the decision maker. PlanEval and the MCDA planning process are described in a case study, where the manager of a forest estate in southwestern Sweden used the program to compare different forest plans made for the estate. In the paper, we analyze possibilities and challenges of this approach and identify problems such as the adherence to formal requirements of MCDA techniques and the difficulty of comparing maps. Possibilities to expedite an MCDA planning process further are also discussed. The findings confirm that integration of an MCDA tool with a forest decision support system is valuable, but requires expert assistance to be successful.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[2]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  HANDBOOK OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH IN NATURAL RESOURCES , 2007 .

[3]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Dealing with Ecological Objectives in the Monsu Planning System , 2004 .

[4]  Thorsten Koch,et al.  ZIMPL User Guide , 2001 .

[5]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning , 2009 .

[6]  Marcel Roelofs,et al.  AIMMS - User's Guide , 2006 .

[7]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  The Heureka Forestry Decision Support System: An Overview , 2011, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[8]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision support in forest management: the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained , 2005 .

[9]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations , 2008 .

[10]  H. L. Scheurman,et al.  Techniques for Prescribing Optimal Timber Harvest and Investment Under Different Objectives—Discussion and Synthesis , 1977 .

[11]  Herbert A. Simon.  The new science of management decision. , 1960 .

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[13]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[14]  A. Weintraub,et al.  Forest management challenges for operational researchers , 1998 .

[15]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[16]  Simon French,et al.  Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software , 2005 .

[17]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Integrating the AHP and HERO into the Process of Participatory Natural Resources Planning , 2001 .

[18]  Harald Vacik,et al.  A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria , 2005 .

[19]  E. Gunn.  Models for Strategic Forest Management , 2007 .

[20]  L. Eriksson,et al.  A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden , 2006 .

[21]  P. Bettinger,et al.  Spatial forest planning: To adopt, or not to adopt? , 2003 .

[22]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Mesta: An internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning , 2009 .

[23]  José G. Borges,et al.  Decision Support Systems in Forest Management , 2008 .

[24]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .