Eco-evolutionary experience in novel species interactions.

A better understanding of how ecological novelty influences interactions in new combinations of species is key for predicting interaction outcomes, and can help focus conservation and management efforts on preventing the introduction of novel organisms or species (including invasive species, GMOs, synthetic organisms, resurrected species and emerging pathogens) that seem particularly 'risky' for resident species. Here, we consider the implications of different degrees of eco-evolutionary experience of interacting resident and non-resident species, define four qualitative risk categories for estimating the probability of successful establishment and impact of novel species and discuss how the effects of novelty change over time. Focusing then on novel predator-prey interactions, we argue that novelty entails density-dependent advantages for non-resident species, with their largest effects often being at low prey densities. This is illustrated by a comparison of predator functional responses and prey predation risk curves between novel species and ecologically similar resident species, and raises important issues for the conservation of endangered resident prey species.

[1]  J. Jeschke Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  G. Blackwell Another World: The composition and consequences of the Introduced Mammal fauna of New Zealand , 2005 .

[3]  E. Aschehoug,et al.  Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. , 2000, Science.

[4]  T. Fritts,et al.  THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam1 , 1998 .

[5]  P. Banks,et al.  Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  M. Forister,et al.  The population ecology of novel plant–herbivore interactions , 2013 .

[7]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts , 2014, PLoS biology.

[8]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Don't judge species on their origins , 2011, Nature.

[9]  P. David,et al.  A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis , 2004 .

[11]  C. Dickman,et al.  Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  S. Gould,et al.  Exaptation—a Missing Term in the Science of Form , 1982, Paleobiology.

[13]  D. Richardson,et al.  Defining the Impact of Non-Native Species , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  G. Norbury,et al.  Invasive mammals and habitat modification interact to generate unforeseen outcomes for indigenous fauna. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[17]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence , 2010 .

[18]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Origin matters: alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumers , 2013 .

[19]  A. Sih,et al.  Predicting novel herbivore–plant interactions , 2013 .

[20]  Salvatore J. Agosta,et al.  On ecological fitting, plant-insect associations, herbivore host shifts, and host plant selection , 2006 .

[21]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change , 1992 .

[22]  G. Gilbert,et al.  The Evolutionary Ecology of Novel Plant-Pathogen Interactions , 2004 .

[23]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Novel Organisms: Comparing Invasive Species, GMOs, and Emerging Pathogens , 2013, AMBIO.

[24]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Predatory Functional Response and Prey Choice Identify Predation Differences between Native/Invasive and Parasitised/Unparasitised Crayfish , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  J. Jeschke,et al.  The role of eco-evolutionary experience in invasion success , 2013 .

[26]  Scott P Carroll,et al.  Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? , 2006, Ecology letters.

[27]  Gregory P. Brown,et al.  Adaptation or preadaptation: why are keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii) less vulnerable to invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) than are other Australian snakes? , 2010, Evolutionary Ecology.

[28]  Jonathan M. Jeschke,et al.  PREDATOR FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES: DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN HANDLING AND DIGESTING PREY , 2002 .

[29]  W. H. van der Putten,et al.  Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naïve? , 2009, Ecology letters.

[30]  B. Blossey,et al.  Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A Hypothesis , 1995 .

[31]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  M. Pace,et al.  Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  J. Thiele,et al.  Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[34]  Miguel Lurgi,et al.  Novel communities from climate change , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  P. Westley,et al.  Hybridization between genetically modified Atlantic salmon and wild brown trout reveals novel ecological interactions , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  D. Richardson,et al.  Searching for phylogenetic pattern in biological invasions , 2007 .

[37]  Gregory P. Brown,et al.  A native dasyurid predator (common planigale, Planigale maculata) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader. , 2008 .

[38]  J. Bart,et al.  Impacts of the Brown Tree Snake: Patterns of Decline and Species Persistence in Guam's Avifauna , 2003 .

[39]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Response of native insect communities to invasive plants. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.

[40]  D. Richardson,et al.  Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide , 2013 .

[41]  C. Laforsch,et al.  Animal Prey Defenses , 2008 .

[42]  H. Dingle,et al.  And the beak shall inherit - evolution in response to invasion. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[43]  A. Chesson,et al.  Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals , 2013 .

[44]  J. Parker,et al.  Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[45]  R. Hufbauer,et al.  Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Theory of Biological Invasions , 2008 .

[46]  S. Jackson,et al.  Novel climates, no‐analog communities, and ecological surprises , 2007 .

[47]  C. Josh Donlan,et al.  Golden eagles, feral pigs, and insular carnivores: How exotic species turn native predators into prey , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  D. Pimentel,et al.  NEW ASSOCIATIONS IN BIOLOGICAL CONTROL: THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1989, The Canadian Entomologist.

[49]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[50]  L. Sundström,et al.  Genetically modified farm animals and fish in agriculture: A review , 2013 .

[51]  I. Atkinson Introduced Mammals in a New Environment , 2006 .

[52]  H. Vogel,et al.  Ecological fits, mis-fits and lotteries involving insect herbivores on the invasive plant, Bunias orientalis , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[53]  L. Sundström,et al.  Growth‐enhanced coho salmon invading other salmon species populations: effects on early survival and growth , 2014 .

[54]  Luis Roman Carrasco,et al.  Comprehensive bioeconomic modelling of multiple harmful non-indigenous species , 2010 .

[55]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[56]  O. Sarnelle,et al.  Native predators and exotic prey –an acquired taste? , 2009 .

[57]  Tina Heger,et al.  What biological invasions ‘are’ is a matter of perspective , 2013 .

[58]  M Rejmánek,et al.  Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[59]  D. Richardson,et al.  Existing and emerging high impact invasive species are characterized by higher functional responses than natives , 2014, Biology Letters.

[60]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Charles S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology , 2001 .

[61]  John L. Orrock,et al.  Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions , 2010 .

[62]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Biotic interactions and plant invasions. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[63]  J. Ewen,et al.  Reintroducing resurrected species: selecting DeExtinction candidates. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[64]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[65]  P. Alpert The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[66]  Florian Altermatt,et al.  Predicting novel trophic interactions in a non-native world. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[67]  Ralph Tollrian,et al.  Consumer‐food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[68]  H. Fritz,et al.  Another call for the end of invasion biology , 2013 .

[69]  P. Banks,et al.  When Does an Alien Become a Native Species? A Vulnerable Native Mammal Recognizes and Responds to Its Long-Term Alien Predator , 2012, PloS one.

[70]  Anthony Ricciardi,et al.  Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach , 2014, Biological Invasions.