Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants.

Numerous studies over the past decade support the claim that infants are equipped with powerful statistical language learning mechanisms. The primary evidence for statistical language learning in word segmentation comes from studies using artificial languages, continuous streams of synthesized syllables that are highly simplified relative to real speech. To what extent can these conclusions be scaled up to natural language learning? In the current experiments, English-learning 8-month-old infants' ability to track transitional probabilities in fluent infant-directed Italian speech was tested (N = 72). The results suggest that infants are sensitive to transitional probability cues in unfamiliar natural language stimuli, and support the claim that statistical learning is sufficiently robust to support aspects of real-world language acquisition.

[1]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[2]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[3]  A. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Vizmuller-Zocco,et al.  Lessico di frequenza dell'italiano parlato , 1994 .

[5]  F. Mancini,et al.  Lunghezza, tipi di sillabe e accento in italiano , 1994 .

[6]  J. Mehler,et al.  Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Pura Guil,et al.  Lessico di frequenza dell´italiano parlato. Milano, Etaslibri, 1993. , 1995 .

[9]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[10]  J. Morgan.  A Rhythmic Bias in Preverbal Speech Segmentation , 1996 .

[11]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .

[12]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[13]  Mary R. Newsome,et al.  The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-Learning Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[15]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Cecile T. L. Kuijpers,et al.  Cross-language word segmentation by 9-month-olds , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[18]  M. Brent,et al.  The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development , 2001, Cognition.

[19]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[20]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[21]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Does Grammar Start Where Statistics Stop? , 2002, Science.

[23]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  Neuroscience. Does grammar start where statistics stop? , 2002, Science.

[24]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[25]  J. Saffran,et al.  From Syllables to Syntax: Multilevel Statistical Learning by 12-Month-Old Infants , 2003 .

[26]  Charles D. Yang.  Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  A. Friederici,et al.  Discrimination of word stress in early infant perception: electrophysiological evidence. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  P. Killeen,et al.  An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests , 2005, Psychological science.

[29]  Daniel Swingley,et al.  Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Stress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation , 2005, Cognition.

[31]  J. Morgan,et al.  Mommy and Me , 2005, Psychological science.

[32]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[33]  Michael D. Tyler,et al.  Testing the limits of statistical language learning , 2006 .

[34]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Learning to Learn: Infants’ Acquisition of Stress-Based Strategies for Word Segmentation , 2007 .

[35]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Can Infants Map Meaning to Newly Segmented Words? , 2007, Psychological science.

[36]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  How the Melody Facilitates the Message and Vice Versa in Infant Learning and Memory , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Modeling human performance in statistical word segmentation , 2010, Cognition.

[38]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Linking sounds to meanings: Infant statistical learning in a natural language , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.