Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for Classifying Functional Damage in Glaucoma

Purpose:To introduce a new method, derived from the Glaucoma Staging System (GSS), for classifying glaucomatous visual field defects. Patients and Methods:Four sample groups composed respectively of 471 (sample #1), 128 (sample #2), 185 (sample #3), and 131 (sample #4) patients with either ocular hypertension or chronic glaucoma were considered. The GSS 2 uses both the MD and CPSD/CLV or PSD/LV perimetric indices to classify visual field defect in 6 stages and in 3 types (generalized, localized, and mixed). The formulas were determined using sample #1. A new borderline stage was created, on the basis of sample #2. The relationship between the PSD/LV and CPSD/CLV values was studied on sample #3 to verify the possibility of using the uncorrected indices instead of the CPSD/CLV. The relationship with other classification methods was studied on sample #4. Results:The GSS 2 showed a strong level of association with the AGIS and the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson methods in staging defect severity. A good correlation was also found with a classification based on the Bebie curve. Conclusions:The GSS 2 was able to correctly classify both damage severity and perimetric defect type in the sample studied, using either the corrected or uncorrected visual field indices. It is a quick and easy method, and its formulas can be introduced in any software.

[1]  A. Mermoud,et al.  Long‐term results of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  Josef Flammer,et al.  The concept of visual field indices , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[4]  H. Bebie,et al.  The cumulative defect curve: Separation of local and diffuse components of visual field damage , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[5]  T. Berg,et al.  Is there general reduction of sensitivity in glaucoma? , 2005, International Ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Olsson,et al.  Physiology of cumulative defect curves; consequences in glaucoma perimetry. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[7]  S R Gollamudi,et al.  Evaluation of corrected loss variance as a visual field index. II. Corrected loss variance in conjunction with mean defect may identify stages of glaucoma. , 1988, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[8]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  A. Mermoud,et al.  Deep Sclerectomy With Collagen Implant in One Eye Compared With Trabeculectomy in the Other Eye of the Same Patient , 2002, Journal of glaucoma.

[10]  G. Corallo,et al.  A Method for Detecting Progression in Glaucoma Patients with Deep, Localized Perimetric Defects , 2003, European journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  P. Brusini Estimating glaucomatous anatomical damage by computerized automated perimetry. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[12]  P. Brusini Clinical use of a New Method for Visual Field Damage Classification in Glaucoma , 1996, European journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Sampaolesi,et al.  Korrelation zwischen der konfokalen Tomographie des Nervus opticus (HRT) und der perimetrischen Frequenzverdoppelungstechnik (FDT) , 2003 .

[14]  O. Bergamin,et al.  Evaluation of the Brusini Glaucoma Staging System for Typing and Staging of Perimetric Results , 1998, Ophthalmologica.

[15]  S. Gollamudi,et al.  Evaluation of corrected loss variance as a visual field index. I. CLV exceeds RMS in discriminating between glaucoma-suspect patients with no loss of visual sensitivity and normal observers. , 1988, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[16]  M. Zulauf,et al.  Evaluation of the Brusini Glaucoma Staging System for Follow-Up in Glaucoma , 1997, European journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  P. Lichter,et al.  The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[18]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Clinical Decisions In Glaucoma , 1993 .

[19]  K. Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Comparison of spatial thresholds and intensity thresholds in glaucoma , 1993, International Ophthalmology.

[20]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. , 1999, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[21]  D B Henson,et al.  Frequency Distribution of Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[22]  S. M. Drance Diffuse visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[23]  J Caprioli,et al.  Automated perimetry in glaucoma. , 1991, American journal of ophthalmology.