Distributed Cognition as a Theoretical Framework for Information Visualization

Even though information visualization (InfoVis) research has matured in recent years, it is generally acknowledged that the field still lacks supporting, encompassing theories. In this paper, we argue that the distributed cognition framework can be used to substantiate the theoretical foundation of InfoVis. We highlight fundamental assumptions and theoretical constructs of the distributed cognition approach, based on the cognitive science literature and a real life scenario. We then discuss how the distributed cognition framework can have an impact on the research directions and methodologies we take as InfoVis researchers. Our contributions are as follows. First, we highlight the view that cognition is more an emergent property of interaction than a property of the human mind. Second, we argue that a reductionist approach to study the abstract properties of isolated human minds may not be useful in informing InfoVis design. Finally we propose to make cognition an explicit research agenda, and discuss the implications on how we perform evaluation and theory building.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[2]  B. Marx The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1985 .

[3]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Jigsaw: Supporting Investigative Analysis through Interactive Visualization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[4]  James T. Enns,et al.  High-speed visual estimation using preattentive processing , 1996, TCHI.

[5]  Stephen W. Hawking,et al.  The Illustrated A Brief History of Time , 1996 .

[6]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[7]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[8]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Beyond guidelines: what can we learn from the visual information seeking mantra? , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'05).

[9]  Jiajie Zhang The Interaction between Perceptual and Cognitive Processes in a Distributed Problem Solving Task , 1993 .

[10]  William Buxton,et al.  Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) , 2008, CHI.

[11]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[13]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Jigsaw meets Blue Iguanodon - The VAST 2007 Contest , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[14]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Graphics and graphic information-processing , 1981 .

[17]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Designing for the Dynamics of Cooperative Work Activities , 1998 .

[18]  L. Pedro,et al.  The ATLAS Experience With Databases for Structured Data With Temporal and Hierarchical Order , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Psychology of science: A framework for the cognitive psychology of science , 1989 .

[20]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[21]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  The Cognitive-Cultural Systems of the Research Laboratory , 2006 .

[22]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[23]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[24]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[25]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[26]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Digital artifacts for remembering and storytelling: posthistory and social network fragments , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[27]  Chris North,et al.  Toward measuring visualization insight , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[28]  CHRISTINE A. HALVERSON,et al.  Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories? , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[29]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[30]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[31]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Implications for design , 2006, CHI.

[32]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Understanding and characterizing insights: how do people gain insights using information visualization? , 2008, BELIV.

[33]  Kristin A. Cook,et al.  Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics , 2005 .

[34]  David Kirsh,et al.  Distributed cognition: a methodological note , 2006 .

[35]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies , 2006, BELIV '06.

[36]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[37]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Information Visualization , 2008, Information Visualization.

[38]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.