Niche width revisited: organizational scope, behavior and performance

Although strategy research typically regards firm scope as a positional characteristic associated with performance differences, we propose that broad contemporary scope also provides insight into the routines that govern firm behavior. To attain broad scope, firms must repeatedly explore outside the boundaries of their current niche. Firms with broad niches therefore operate under a set of routines that repeatedly propel them into new market segments, expanding their niche. These niche expansions, however, involve risky organizational changes, behavior that disadvantages generalists relative to specialists, despite the positional value of broad scope. Empirical analyses of machine tool manufacturers and computer workstation manufacturers support this conjecture: (i) generalists introduce new products at a higher than optimal rate, thereby increasing their exit rates; and (ii) generalists also more frequently launch new models with novel features or targeted at new consumer segments rather than improving only incrementally on existing products, further accelerating their odds of failure. After adjusting for these behavioral differences, broad niche widths reduce exit rates, suggesting that they provide positional advantages. The paper discusses how this phenomenon may help to explain the diversification and multi-nationality discounts. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[2]  E. Thorndike The law of effect. , 1927 .

[3]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[5]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[6]  L. T. C. Rolt,et al.  A short history of machine tools , 1966 .

[7]  Peter Schrag,et al.  The decline of the WASP , 1971 .

[8]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[10]  Stephen Hill,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm , 1981 .

[11]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[12]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[13]  B W Kernighan,et al.  The UNIX Operating System: A Model for Software Design , 1982, Science.

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[15]  G. Maddala Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[16]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Niche Width and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[18]  R. Hastie Causes and effects of causal attribution , 1984 .

[19]  J. Perloff,et al.  Equilibrium with Product Differentiation , 1984 .

[20]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[21]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[22]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Concentration and Specialization: Dynamics of Niche Width in Populations of Organizations , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[24]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[25]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[26]  SrinivasanKannan,et al.  Broader Product Line , 1990 .

[27]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Broader product line: a necessity to achieve success? , 1990 .

[28]  John H. Dunning,et al.  Some Concluding Remarks , 1991 .

[29]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distributions , 1992 .

[30]  G. Guo Event-history analysis for left-truncated data. , 1993, Sociological methodology.

[31]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[32]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Organizational Niches and the Dynamics of Organizational Founding , 1994 .

[33]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Tobin's q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  A. Swaminathan The proliferation of specialist organizations in the American wine industry, 1941-1990 , 1995 .

[35]  Robert J. Lempert,et al.  The Decline of the U.S. Machine-Tool Industry and Prospects for Its Sustainable Recovery , 1995 .

[36]  E. Ofek,et al.  Diversification's effect on firm value , 1995 .

[37]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  MODELING INTERNAL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE , 1995 .

[38]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Henri Servaes,et al.  The Value of Diversification During the Conglomerate Merger Wave , 1996 .

[40]  Philip Bromiley,et al.  DECISION MAKING IN AN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING: COGNITIVE AND ORGANIZATIONAL INFLUENCES ON RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMERCIAL LENDING , 1997 .

[41]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Indicators of discontinuous technological change: an exploratory study of two discontinuities in the machine tool industry , 1997 .

[42]  M. Hannan Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Logical Fromalizations1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  H. Rao,et al.  The Demography of Corporations and Industries , 1999 .

[44]  Simi Kedia,et al.  Explaining the Diversification Discount , 1999 .

[45]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Racing and Back-Pedalling into the Future: New Product Introduction and Organizational Mortality in the US Bicycle Industry, 1880-1918 , 2000 .

[46]  O. Sorenson Letting the market work for you: an evolutionary perspective on product strategy , 2000 .

[47]  Focused Firms and the Incentive to Innovate , 2000 .

[48]  Belén Villalonga Does Diversification Cause the 'Diversification Discount'? , 2000 .

[49]  A. Stinchcombe Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.

[50]  Belén Villalonga Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from Bits Establishment-Level Data , 2000 .

[51]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[52]  Stanislav D. Dobrev,et al.  Dynamics of Niche Width and Resource Partitioning1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? Product Proliferation and Organizational Failure , 2001 .

[54]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Resource Partitioning and the Evolution of Specialist Organizations: The Role of Location and Identity in the U.S. Wine Industry , 2001 .

[55]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity , 2002 .

[56]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[57]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The Organizational Niche* , 2003 .

[58]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Interdependence and Adaptability: Organizational Learning and the Long - Term Effect of Integration , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[59]  Tai-Young Kim,et al.  Shifting Gears, Shifting Niches: Organizational Inertia and Change in the Evolution of the U.S. Automobile Industry, 1885-1981 , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Raja Roy,et al.  INCUMBENT SURVIVAL DURING MARKET FUSION IN MATURED INDUSTRIES: THE INFLUENCE OF COMPONENT AND ARCHITECTURAL CAPABILITIES ON THE SURVIVAL OF U.S. MACHINE TOOL MANUFACTURERS DURING 1975–1995 , 2004 .

[61]  Belen Villalonga,et al.  Diversification Discount or Premium? New Evidence from the Business Information Tracking Series , 2004 .

[62]  Peter W. Roberts,et al.  Product-line expansion and resource cannibalization , 2005 .

[63]  J. de Wilde,et al.  Some concluding remarks , 1962, Entomophaga.

[64]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[65]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2008 .