Changing paradigms in the management of Open Injuries

Background The definition of an open fracture where the fracture and the hematoma communicate with the external environment is well known. But the treating surgeon should also be aware that the skin defect may not lie directly under the fracture site and may communicate with the fracture under degloved skin. Hence any fracture with a wound in the same region should be considered an open injury until proven otherwise by exploration. Open injuries – often high-velocity injuriesare frequently associated with higher risk of complications including amputation [1,2,3,4]. The present challenge to the trauma surgeon is not simply to salvage the injured limb but also provide a good functional outcome. The principles of management of open injuries have evolved with time and today with advances in both orthopaedic and plastic surgery, the management is now in the ‘Era of functional restoration’. Surgeons have now realised that success of open injury management is not merely salvage and one should not succumb to the ‘triumph of technique over reason’. The paradigm has now shifted to restoring a good functional outcome to the injured patient and also focusing on developing safe protocols of bone and soft tissue reconstruction5. In this article, we discuss the important recommended practices which are determinant of a good outcome in open injury management.

[1]  Devendra,et al.  Changing paradigms in the management of Open Injuries , 2017 .

[2]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Open injuries of the lower extremity: issues and unknown frontiers. , 2012, Injury.

[3]  S. Rajasekaran,et al.  A philosophy of care of open injuries based on the Ganga hospital score. , 2007, Injury.

[4]  A. Pollak Timing of Débridement of Open Fractures , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[5]  S. Rajasekaran,et al.  A score for predicting salvage and outcome in Gustilo type-IIIA and type-IIIB open tibial fractures. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  M. Sugrue,et al.  An evaluation of trauma team response in a major trauma hospital in 100 patients with predominantly minor injuries. , 2000, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[7]  C. Pradier,et al.  Epidemiology of Bacterial Infection During Management of Open Leg Fractures , 1999, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[8]  D. R. Brown,et al.  Impact on process of trauma care delivery 1 year after the introduction of a trauma program in a provincial trauma center. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  P M Reilly,et al.  The importance of the command-physician in trauma resuscitation. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  Jackson Lee,et al.  Efficacy of Cultures in the Management of Open Fractures , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  A. Emami,et al.  Changing epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures. 513 cases compared between 1971-1975 and 1986-1990. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  H. Kreder,et al.  The significance of perioperative cultures in open pediatric lower-extremity fractures. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Charles A. Rockwood,et al.  Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults , 1991 .

[14]  C. Edwards,et al.  Severe open tibial fractures. Results treating 202 injuries with external fixation. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  R. D'ambrosia,et al.  Treatment of the multiply injured patient: plans for treatment and problems of major trauma. , 1984, Instructional course lectures.

[16]  R. Gustilo Management of infected fractures. , 1982, Instructional course lectures.

[17]  M. Patzakis Orthopedics-epitomes of progress: the use of antibiotics in open fractures. , 1979, The Western journal of medicine.