Adaptive Finite Element Methods with convergence rates

Summary.Adaptive Finite Element Methods for numerically solving elliptic equations are used often in practice. Only recently [12], [17] have these methods been shown to converge. However, this convergence analysis says nothing about the rates of convergence of these methods and therefore does, in principle, not guarantee yet any numerical advantages of adaptive strategies versus non-adaptive strategies. The present paper modifies the adaptive method of Morin, Nochetto, and Siebert [17] for solving the Laplace equation with piecewise linear elements on domains in ℝ2 by adding a coarsening step and proves that this new method has certain optimal convergence rates in the energy norm (which is equivalent to the H1 norm). Namely, it is shown that whenever s>0 and the solution u is such that for each n≥1, it can be approximated to accuracy O(n−s) in the energy norm by a continuous, piecewise linear function on a triangulation with n cells (using complete knowledge of u), then the adaptive algorithm constructs an approximation of the same type with the same asymptotic accuracy while using only information gained during the computational process. Moreover, the number of arithmetic computations in the proposed method is also of order O(n) for each n≥1. The construction and analysis of this adaptive method relies on the theory of nonlinear approximation.

[1]  H. Triebel Interpolation Theory, Function Spaces, Differential Operators , 1978 .

[2]  P. Oswald,et al.  Remarks on the Abstract Theory of Additive and Multiplicative Schwarz Algorithms , 1995 .

[3]  Ricardo H. Nochetto,et al.  Data Oscillation and Convergence of Adaptive FEM , 2000, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[4]  Wolfgang Dahmen,et al.  Adaptive Wavelet Methods II—Beyond the Elliptic Case , 2002, Found. Comput. Math..

[5]  Stephan Dahlke,et al.  Besov regularity for elliptic boundary value problems in polygonal domains , 1999 .

[6]  Rüdiger Verfürth,et al.  A posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques , 1994 .

[7]  William F. Mitchell,et al.  A comparison of adaptive refinement techniques for elliptic problems , 1989, TOMS.

[8]  Michael Vogelius,et al.  Feedback and adaptive finite element solution of one-dimensional boundary value problems , 1984 .

[9]  Ronald A. DeVore,et al.  Fast computation in adaptive tree approximation , 2004, Numerische Mathematik.

[10]  R. DeVore,et al.  Besov regularity for elliptic boundary value problems , 1997 .

[11]  I. Babuska,et al.  A feedback element method with a posteriori error estimation: Part I. The finite element method and some basic properties of the a posteriori error estimator , 1987 .

[12]  Ronald A. DeVore,et al.  Besov spaces on domains in , 1993 .

[13]  Pencho Petrushev,et al.  Nonlinear piecewise polynomial approximation beyond Besov spaces , 2003 .

[14]  Wolfgang Dahmen,et al.  Approximation Classes for Adaptive Methods , 2002 .

[15]  J. Petersen Die Theorie der regulären graphs , 1891 .

[16]  W. Dörfler A convergent adaptive algorithm for Poisson's equation , 1996 .

[17]  W. Dahmen,et al.  Multilevel preconditioning , 1992 .

[18]  Wolfgang Dahmen,et al.  Adaptive wavelet methods for elliptic operator equations: Convergence rates , 2001, Math. Comput..

[19]  Kenneth Steiglitz,et al.  Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity , 1981 .

[20]  Peter Oswald,et al.  Multilevel Finite Element Approximation , 1994 .

[21]  R. DeVore,et al.  BESOV SPACES ON DOMAINS IN Rd , 1993 .