Do alien plant species profit more from high resource supply than natives? A trait‐based analysis

Aim Previous studies comparing conditions of high- versus low-resource environments have pointed at differences in key traits that would allow aliens to perform better than natives under high-resource conditions. We generalize and test the robustness of this idea by exploring how trait differentiation between aliens and natives changes along continuous resource gradients. Location Global. Methods We constructed a database of three leaf traits (specific leaf area, SLA; photosynthetic capacity, Amass; leaf nitrogen content, Nmass) that are important for carbon capturing strategies in plants. The database includes 2448 native and 961 alien species over 88 locations world-wide. Using rank correlations and mixed-effect linear models, we assessed the relations between plant traits and climatic, edaphic and human disturbance gradients. Then we determined how the differences in traits between natives and aliens changed along the same gradients. Results Across all environments, aliens were found to have higher SLA, Nmass and Amass than natives. These differences were observed both globally and when controlling for co-occurrence. Also, higher average trait values were found in higher resource supply environments. However, trait differences between natives and aliens remained constant along the evaluated environmental and disturbance gradients. When compared in a multidimensional trait space defined by the leaf economics spectrum, co-occurring aliens and natives showed no between-group differences and no relation with any of the evaluated gradients. Main conclusions We suggest that although increased resource availability is positively related to higher carbon capture strategies (determined via higher plant leaf trait values), these benefits remain the same for aliens and natives. Therefore, we conclude that high-resource environments do not specifically cause aliens to outperform natives with respect to carbon capture, or at least not more than in other environments.

[1]  J. Stone,et al.  Fire, Plant Invasions, and Erosion Events on Western Rangelands , 2011 .

[2]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Why research on traits of invasive plants tells us very little. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  H. Olff,et al.  Functional differences between native and alien species: a global-scale comparison: Functional differences of native and alien plants , 2010 .

[4]  J. Kominoski,et al.  Can ecological stoichiometry help explain patterns of biological invasions , 2010 .

[5]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[6]  M. Leishman,et al.  Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies , 2010 .

[7]  M. Westoby,et al.  Costs of height gain in rainforest saplings: main-stem scaling, functional traits and strategy variation across 75 species. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[8]  Jordi Sardans,et al.  Faster returns on ‘leaf economics’ and different biogeochemical niche in invasive compared with native plant species , 2009 .

[9]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plant invasion , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  P. Reich,et al.  A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility , 2009 .

[11]  M. Leishman,et al.  Reproductive output of invasive versus native plants. , 2008 .

[12]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? , 2008 .

[13]  A. Moles,et al.  A new framework for predicting invasive plant species , 2007 .

[14]  A. Ares,et al.  Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community- and global-scale comparisons. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[15]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Assessing the function of house sparrows' bib size using a flexible meta-analysis method , 2007 .

[16]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems , 2007, Nature.

[17]  D. Richardson,et al.  Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility , 2006 .

[18]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. , 2006, Ecology.

[19]  D. Blumenthal Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[20]  Daniel S. Falster,et al.  User's guide to SMATR : standardised major axis tests and routines version 2.0, copyright 2006 , 2006 .

[21]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[22]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? , 2005 .

[23]  D. Blumenthal Interrelated Causes of Plant Invasion , 2005, Science.

[24]  William G. Lee,et al.  Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate , 2005 .

[25]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Experimental evidence for the effects of additional water, nutrients and physical disturbance on invasive plants in low fertility Hawkesbury Sandstone soils, Sydney, Australia , 2005 .

[26]  D. Richardson,et al.  Effects of Invasive Alien Plants on Fire Regimes , 2004 .

[27]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[28]  N. Batjes SOTER-based soil parameter estimates for Southern Africa (ver.1.0) , 2004 .

[29]  C. Daehler PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS OF Co-OCCURRING NATIVE AND ALIEN INVASIVE PLANTS: Implications for Conservation and Restoration , 2003 .

[30]  J. Flexas,et al.  Relationship between maximum leaf photosynthesis, nitrogen content and specific leaf area in balearic endemic and non-endemic mediterranean species. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[31]  E. Sanderson,et al.  The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild , 2002 .

[32]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Toward a Causal Explanation of Plant Invasiveness: Seedling Growth and Life‐History Strategies of 29 Pine (Pinus) Species , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[34]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[35]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .

[36]  J. Anderson,et al.  Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview , 1997 .

[37]  K. Thompson,et al.  Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same? , 1995 .

[38]  H. Lambers,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[39]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[40]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[41]  G. F. Gause,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF VITO VOLTERRA'S MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE. , 1934, Science.

[42]  G. Gauze The struggle for existence, by G. F. Gause. , 1934 .