Information Science in 2003: A Critique

The author aims to review the status of information science (IS) as a discipline, with particular focus on the UK. A consideration of the discipline begins by comparing definitions of IS. Two visions of the impact of IS are presented to illustrate a key problem area addressed by the discipline. Indicators of a discipline are summarized and Biglan's categorization of disciplines is explained. The author provides a critique of opinions on the nature of IS as a discipline, using Biglan's categories as a framework. The author contrasts the views of those who see the discipline as problematically fragmented and those who envision a discipline of fruitfully interlinked specialisms. This section of the paper concludes by considering disciplinary boundaries and the international scope of the discipline. The last section of the paper reviews the state of IS in the UK, drawing on evidence and on personal experience. Factors considered are: evidence of networks and communities of practice; the name and standing of academic departments and courses; artefacts and personal identification. The author concludes by identifying particular challenges for IS in the UK and indicates areas for research.

[1]  Julian Warner.  Writing and Literary Work in Copyright: A Binational and Historical Analysis , 1993, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  I. S. Simpson.  The institute of information scientists criteria for information science , 1977, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Bill Crowley.  The Control and Direction of Professional Education , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[4]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[5]  D. Hendrick,et al.  Introduction , 1998, Thorax.

[6]  Michael Enright,et al.  Marketing and Conflicting Dates for its Emergence: Hotchkiss, Bartels, the 'Fifties School' and Alternative Accounts , 2002 .

[7]  Jason Farradane.  Knowledge, information, and information science , 1980 .

[8]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Brian Vickery,et al.  Information Science in Theory and Practice , 1987 .

[10]  Laurence B. Heilprin.  The library community at a technological and philosophical crossroads: Necessary and sufficient conditions for survival , 1980, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  J. Farradane,et al.  Information Science , 1971, Nature.

[12]  A. Schrader.  In Search of a Name: Information Science and Its Conceptual Antecedents. , 1984 .

[13]  A. Newell.  REFLECTIONS ON THE STRUCTURE OF AN INTERDISCIPLINE , 1982 .

[14]  S Adams,et al.  President's Page. , 1968, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[15]  Michael K. Buckland.  The Landscape of Information Science: The American Society for Information Science at 62 , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[17]  Stuart Hannabuss.  Kinds of Knowledge , 1991 .

[18]  F. Machlup,et al.  The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages , 1984 .

[19]  W. Boyd Rayward,et al.  The History and Historiography of Information Science: Some Reflections , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995 , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theory and metatheory of information science: a new interpretation , 1998, J. Documentation.

[22]  Marion Huckle.  Driving Change in the Profession: Subject Benchmarking in UK Library and Information Management , 2002 .

[23]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[24]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Ben-Ami Lipetz,et al.  Aspects of JASIS Authorship through Five Decades , 1999, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[26]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice: Learning , 1998 .

[27]  D. Ellis,et al.  Information science and information systems: conjuct subjects disjunct disciplines , 1999 .

[28]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The Invisible Substrate of Information Science , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[30]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[31]  B. Cronin,et al.  Conceptions of library and information science: historical, empirical, and theoretical perspectives , 1992 .

[32]  Gernot Wersig,et al.  The depersonalization of kno wledge : Communication technology , 2002 .

[33]  Judith Broady-Preston.  The Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) and Subject Review: The Viewpoint of the Assessor , 2002 .

[34]  Ellen Bonnevie-Nebelong,et al.  A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: the case of the Journal of Information Science , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[35]  B. C. Brookes.  The foundations of information science , 1980 .

[36]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Information science as "Little Science":The implications of a bibliometric analysis of theJournal of the American Society for Information Science , 2001, Scientometrics.

[37]  Howard D. White.  Scientist‐poets wanted: , 1999 .

[38]  Journal of Information Science , 1984 .

[39]  H. Albrechtsen,et al.  Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[40]  David Ellis,et al.  Information Science and Information Systems: Conjunct Subjects Disjunct Disciplines , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[41]  B. C. Brookes.  The foundations of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects , 1980 .

[42]  Tom Stonier,et al.  Towards a new theory of information , 1986, J. Inf. Sci..

[43]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  The concept of information , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  C. Benito.  Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , 2003 .

[45]  Lynne McKechnie,et al.  The use of theory in information science research , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[46]  Jose-Marie Griffiths.  Back to the Future: Information Science for the New Millennium , 2005 .

[47]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[48]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity , 2000 .

[49]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economics , 1870, The Indian medical gazette.

[50]  J. Pfeffer.  Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[51]  Judith Elkin.  The UK Research Assessment Exercise 2001 , 2002 .

[52]  Sheila Webber.  Teaching of marketing and quality management in schools of library and information science (LIS) in the UK: a review and report of findings , 2002 .

[53]  Jack Harris,et al.  The UK research assessment exercise , 1997 .

[54]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .

[55]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information as thing , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[56]  Igor Aleksander,et al.  The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages , 1986, J. Inf. Technol..

[57]  Nigel Ford.  The Growth of Understanding in Information Science: Towards a Developmental Model , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[58]  Darrell Stam.  Conceptions of library and information science; historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives ? ? ? (?.). Taylor Graham, London (1992). 314 pp. $46.00, ISBN 0-947568-52-2 , 1993 .

[59]  A. J. Meadows.  The Origins of information science , 1987 .

[60]  Donald T. Hawkins.  Information Science Abstracts: Tracking the literature of information science. Part 1: Definition and map , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[61]  J. Warner.  W(H)ITHER Information Science?/! , 2001, The Library Quarterly.

[62]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Information Science in 2010: A Loughborough University View , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[63]  Merlin Stone,et al.  Future Marketers: Future Curriculum: Future Shock? , 2002 .