A new stochastic particle‐tracking approach for fractured sedimentary formations

[1] Explicit particle-tracking simulations in both fractures and surrounding sediments are conceptually complex and difficult to implement. This is mainly due to the difference in the nature of the velocity fields in fractures and the matrix. The major problems are (1) to avoid particles in the matrix jumping over fractures and (2) to control particle behavior at the interfaces between fractures and the matrix. We developed a particle-tracking method that models advection and diffusion explicitly in both fractures and the matrix. Analogously to most flow simulations, we conceptualize transport by two separate domains, the fracture and the matrix domains, which exchange particles between them. No a priori assumptions on transport mechanisms in the matrix have to be made. Each individual particle step stops at an interface between two matrix cells, between two fracture cells, or between the matrix and a fracture. Mass exchange at the interface from fractures to the matrix is controlled by the fracture aperture, the matrix flux perpendicular to the fracture plane, the flux within the fracture, and a diffusive component. The method is developed for fractured sedimentary rocks where the advective fluxes in the matrix can be as large as the fracture fluxes. However, it could also be applied to fractured crystalline rocks where the matrix contribution is smaller. Finally, some simple applications to a fractured shale formation in northern Switzerland are included to illustrate the usefulness of this method to investigate transport in fractured sedimentary formations.

[1]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  A new particle‐tracking approach to simulating transport in heterogeneous fractured porous media , 2010 .

[2]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks , 2005 .

[3]  J. Hadermann,et al.  The Grimsel (Switzerland) migration experiment : integrating field experiments, laboratory investigations and modelling , 1996 .

[4]  Bernard Bourbiaux,et al.  Fractured Reservoir Simulation: a Challenging and Rewarding Issue , 2010 .

[5]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  Transport upscaling in heterogeneous aquifers: What physical parameters control memory functions? , 2008 .

[6]  Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy,et al.  Transport and intersection mixing in random fracture networks with power law length distributions , 2001 .

[7]  T. A. Prickett,et al.  A "random-walk" solute transport model for selected groundwater quality evaluations , 1981 .

[8]  Y. Tsang Usage of “Equivalent apertures” for rock fractures as derived from hydraulic and tracer tests , 1992 .

[9]  Brian Berkowitz,et al.  Mass transfer at fracture intersections: An evaluation of mixing models , 1994 .

[10]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Semi‐analytical solutions for solute transport and exchange in fractured porous media , 2012 .

[11]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  The Random Walk Method in Pollutant Transport Simulation , 1988 .

[12]  Antoine Lejay,et al.  Simulation of a stochastic process in a discontinuous layered medium , 2011 .

[13]  René Therrien,et al.  A method to discretize non‐planar fractures for 3D subsurface flow and transport simulations , 2008 .

[14]  X. Sanchez‐Vila,et al.  On matrix diffusion: formulations, solution methods and qualitative effects , 1998 .

[15]  Vincent Martin,et al.  Modeling Fractures and Barriers as Interfaces for Flow in Porous Media , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  Continuous Groundwater Velocity Fields and Path Lines in Linear, Bilinear, and Trilinear Finite Elements , 1992 .

[17]  C. Darcel,et al.  Flow in multiscale fractal fracture networks , 2006, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[18]  Pierre M. Adler,et al.  Solute transport at fracture intersections , 2002 .

[19]  P. Davy,et al.  Connectivity‐consistent mapping method for 2‐D discrete fracture networks , 2010 .

[20]  A. Hoch,et al.  Self‐consistency of a heterogeneous continuum porous medium representation of a fractured medium , 2000 .

[21]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  Diffusion in the rock matrix: An important factor in radionuclide retardation? , 1980 .

[22]  Yiping Guo,et al.  On the appropriate “equivalent aperture” for the description of solute transport in single fractures: Laboratory‐scale experiments , 2008 .

[23]  Roy Haggerty,et al.  Experimental visualization of solute transport and mass transfer processes in two-dimensional conductivity fields with connected regions of high conductivity. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Urban Svensson,et al.  A continuum representation of fracture networks. Part I: Method and basic test cases , 2001 .

[25]  M. F. Lough,et al.  Hierarchical modeling of flow in naturally fractured formations with multiple length scales , 2001 .

[26]  Peter Salamon,et al.  A review and numerical assessment of the random walk particle tracking method. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[27]  D. W. Pollock Semianalytical Computation of Path Lines for Finite‐Difference Models , 1988 .

[28]  M. Becker,et al.  Tracer transport in fractured crystalline rock: Evidence of nondiffusive breakthrough tailing , 2000 .

[29]  S. Churakov,et al.  Up-Scaling of Molecular Diffusion Coefficients in Clays: A Two-Step Approach , 2011 .

[30]  Frederick Delay,et al.  Simulating Solute Transport in Porous or Fractured Formations Using Random Walk Particle Tracking: A Review , 2005 .

[31]  E. Sudicky,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of variably-saturated flow and solute transport in discretely-fractured porous media , 1996 .

[32]  Ahmed E. Hassan,et al.  On mapping fracture networks onto continuum , 2008 .