The chancellor model: Forecasting German elections

Our forecast model for German Bundestag elections relies on three predictors: (1) the popularity of the incumbent chancellor (hence the christening of it as the "Chancellor Model"); (2) the long-term partisan balance in the German electorate; and (3) the cost of ruling, as captured by the tenure of the government in office. The model forecasts the vote share of the governing parties (typically two, such as Social Democrats and Greens, or Christian Democrats and Free Democrats), except for instances of a grand coalition. The coefficients of the predictors are estimated based on elections since 1949, the beginning of the Federal Republic. The out-of-sample forecasts of the model deviate from the actual results by just over one percentage point, on average. The first real-time test of the model came in 2002. The forecast issued three months before Election Day picked the incumbent vote share to the decimal (47.1% for the SPD-Greens coalition); for the 2005 election, called a year early, our forecast three weeks before Election Day was just three-tenths of a percentage off the mark. For the upcoming election, we offer separate forecasts, conditional at this moment, for each of the two parties in the grand coalition.

[1]  H. Norpoth,et al.  Soll und Haben: die deutsche Wählerschaft rechnet mit den Parteien ab: Manuskript für den Tagungsband "50 Jahre Empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland" , 2000 .

[2]  A. Abramowitz It's about time: Forecasting the 2008 presidential election with the time-for-change model , 2008 .

[3]  H. Norpoth Party Identification in West Germany , 1978 .

[4]  T. Gschwend,et al.  The Red-Green Victory: Against All Odds? , 2003 .

[5]  G. Kramer Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964 , 1971, American Political Science Review.

[6]  H. Norpoth,et al.  "Wenn am nächsten Sonntag ...": ein Prognosemodell für Bundestagswahlen , 2001 .

[7]  H. Rattinger,et al.  Parties, candidates and issues in the German federal election of 1980: An application of normal vote analysis , 1982 .

[8]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Leading Economic Indicators, the Polls, and the Presidential Vote , 2008, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[9]  E. Tufte,et al.  Political Control of the Economy. , 1980 .

[10]  M. Lewis-Beck,et al.  Economics and Politics The calculus of support , 1991 .

[11]  H. Norpoth,et al.  Prognosemodell auf dem Prüfstand: Die Bundestagswahl 2005 , 2005 .

[12]  V. Key,et al.  Politics, parties, and pressure groups , 1948 .

[13]  Angus Campbell,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[14]  Michael S. Lewis-Beck,et al.  The Job of President and the Jobs Model Forecast: Obama for '08? , 2008, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[15]  M. Klein,et al.  50 Jahre Empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland , 2000 .

[16]  James C. Garand,et al.  Before the vote : forecasting American national elections , 2000 .

[17]  H. Norpoth On a short leash: Term limits and the economic voter , 2002 .

[18]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Retrospective voting in American national elections , 1981 .

[19]  Herbert F. Weisberg,et al.  The American Voter Revisited , 2008 .

[20]  T. Gschwend Ticket-splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: Evidence from Germany , 2007 .

[21]  James E. Campbell The Trial-Heat Forecast of the 2008 Presidential Vote: Performance and Value Considerations in an Open-Seat Election , 2008, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[22]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  Forecasting the 2008 Presidential Election with the Time-for-Change Model , 2008, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[23]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[24]  Thomas M. Holbrook Incumbency, National Conditions, and the 2008 Presidential Election , 2008, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[25]  Helmut Norpoth,et al.  On the Razor's Edge: The Forecast of the Primary Model , 2008, PS: Political Science & Politics.