Simulating Instructional Roles through Pedagogical Agents

This paper describes the design and empirical validation of three distinct pedagogical agent roles (Expert, Motivator, and Mentor) for college students within the MIMIC (Multiple Intelligent Mentors Instructing Collaboratively) agent-based research environment. The pedagogical agent roles were operationalized by image, animation, affect, voice and script, and were developed in Poser 4 and implemented via Microsoft Agent. Two controlled experiments validated the instantiation of the three roles according to learner perception (N=78) and actual impact on motivation and learning (N=71). The results confirmed that the agent roles were not only perceived by the students to reflect their intended purposes but also led to significant changes in learning and motivation, as designed. Specifically, the Expert agent led to increased information acquisition, the Motivator led to increased self-efficacy, and the Mentor led to overall improved learning and motivation. The implications for intelligent tutoring and multi-agent system design and development is discussed.

[1]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[2]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  The impact of the instructional planning self-reflective tool on preservice teacher performance, disposition, and self-efficacy beliefs regarding systematic instructional planning , 2001 .

[3]  Philip Barker.  Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates the Human‐Computer Relationship , 2006 .

[4]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Intelligent Agents as Cognitive Tools for Education. , 1999 .

[5]  Amy Soller,et al.  Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System , 2001 .

[6]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Teaching Tactics and Dialog in AutoTutor , 2001 .

[8]  Allan Jeong,et al.  Gender interactions in online debates: Look who's arguing with whom , 2003 .

[9]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  The Pedagogical Agent Split-Persona Effect: When Two Agents are Better than One , 2003 .

[10]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  How might people interact with agents , 1994, CACM.

[11]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  The Impact of Image and Voice with Pedagogical Agents , 2003 .

[12]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[13]  P. Hietala,et al.  The Competence of Learning Companion Agents , 1997 .

[14]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. , 1996 .

[15]  J. Cassell.  Computer Vision for Human–Machine Interaction: A Framework for Gesture Generation and Interpretation , 1998 .

[16]  Wolff‐Michael Roth.  Gestures: Their Role in Teaching and Learning , 2001 .

[17]  Claude Frasson,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education , 1990 .

[18]  A. L. Baylor,et al.  A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions , 2006 .

[19]  Jeeheon Ryu,et al.  THE PSYCHOMETRIC STRUCTURE OF PEDAGOGICAL AGENT PERSONA , 2005 .

[20]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction , 2006 .

[21]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  The Impact of Pedagogical Agent Image on Affective Outcomes , 2004 .

[22]  M. Driscoll.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction , 1993 .

[23]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[24]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  The Role of Roles , 2003, J. Object Technol..

[25]  Gordon I. McCalla,et al.  The Caring Personal Agent , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[26]  Arthur Baskin,et al.  Learning companion systems , 1989 .

[27]  Bridget Cooper,et al.  Care - Making the Affective Leap: More Than a Concerned Interest in a Learner's Cognitive Abilities , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[28]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship , 2005 .

[29]  A. Bandura,et al.  Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. , 1981 .

[30]  C. Creider.  Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1994 .

[31]  Amy Baylor.  Multiple Intelligent Mentors Instructing Collaboratively (MIMIC): Developing a Theoretical Framework. , 1999 .

[32]  Jeeheon Ryu,et al.  The Effects of Image and Animation in Enhancing Pedagogical Agent Persona , 2003 .

[33]  A. L. Baylor,et al.  The Effects of Pedagogical Agent Voice and Animation on Learning, Motivation and Perceived Persona , 2003 .

[34]  C. Nass,et al.  Voices, boxes, and sources of messages: Computers and social actors. , 1993 .

[35]  D. Schunk.  Social Cognitive Theory and Self-Regulated Learning , 1989 .

[36]  R. Atkinson.  Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. , 2002 .

[37]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Investigating Multiple Pedagogical Perspectives through MIMIC (Multiple Intelligent Mentors Instructing Collaboratively) , 2001 .

[38]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[39]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[40]  W. Lewis Johnson.  Pedagogical Agent Research at CARTE , 2001, AI Mag..

[41]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Social role awareness in animated agents , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[42]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[43]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Agent-Based Learning Environments as a Research Tool for Investigating Teaching and Learning , 2002 .

[44]  Tak-Wai Chan,et al.  Exploring the Design of Computer Supports for Reciprocal Tutoring , 1997 .

[45]  Claude Frasson,et al.  Analyzing a new learning strategy according to different knowledge levels , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[46]  Greg Kearsley,et al.  Intelligent Agents and Instructional Systems: Implications of a New Paradigm. , 1993 .

[47]  Carolyn Saarni,et al.  Epilogue: Emotion communication and relationship context , 2001 .

[48]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Factors that Influence the Perception of Feedback Delivered by a Pedagogical Agent , 2001, Int. J. Speech Technol..

[49]  T. Bickmore.  Relational agents : effecting change through human-computer relationships , 2003 .

[50]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Vicarious Learning: Effects of Overhearing Dialog and Monologue-like Discourse in a Virtual Tutoring Session , 2003 .

[51]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  The Role of Gender and Ethnicity in Pedagogical Agent Perception , 2003 .

[52]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Which Pedagogical Agent do Learners Choose? The Effects of Gender and Ethnicity , 2003 .

[53]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  People Power: A Human-Computer Collaborative Learning System , 1992, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[54]  H. Prendinger,et al.  Carrying the Role-Playing Metaphor to Interactive Learning Environments , 2001 .

[55]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective Computing , 1997 .

[56]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Pedagogical agents as social models for engineering: The influence of agent appearance on female choice , 2005, AIED.

[57]  J. Beishuizen,et al.  Students' and teachers' cognitions about good teachers. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[58]  A. L. Baylor.  Expanding preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents , 2002 .

[59]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion , 2001, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[60]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  STEPS: a simulated, tutorable physics student , 1995 .

[61]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[62]  Thomas Erickson.  Designing agents as if people mattered , 1997 .

[63]  Amy L. Baylor,et al.  Beyond Butlers: Intelligent Agents as Mentors , 2000 .

[64]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[65]  Laura M. Stough,et al.  Identifying Teacher Expertise: An Examination of Researchers' Decision Making , 2005 .