A Plan for Advanced Guidance and Control Technology for 2nd Generation Reusable Launch Vehicles

Advanced guidance and control (AG&C) technologies are critical for meeting safety/reliability and cost requirements for the next generation of reusable launch vehicle (RLV). This becomes clear upon examining the number of expendable launch vehicle failures in the recent past where AG&C technologies would have saved a RLV with the same failure mode, the additional vehicle problems where this technology applies, and the costs associated with mission design with or without all these failure issues. The state-of-the-art in guidance and control technology, as well as in computing technology, is at the point where we can took to the possibility of being able to safely return a RLV in any situation where it can physically be recovered. This paper outlines reasons for AG&C, current technology efforts, and the additional work needed for making this goal a reality.

[1]  J. C. Harpold,et al.  Shuttle entry guidance , 1978 .

[2]  J. R. Thibodeau,et al.  Space Shuttle ascent guidance, navigation, and control , 1979 .

[3]  G. M. Tsikalas.  Space Shuttle autoland design , 1982 .

[4]  Steven J. Sponaugle,et al.  Space Shuttle guidance for multiple main engine failures during first stage , 1987 .

[5]  Thomas E. Moore,et al.  Space shuttle entry terminal area energy management , 1991 .

[6]  John M. Hanson,et al.  ASCENT, TRANSITION, ENTRY, AND ABORT GUIDANCE ALGORITHM DESIGN FOR THE X-33 VEHICLE , 1998 .

[7]  Marc L. Steinberg,et al.  Comparison of Intelligent, Adaptive, and Nonlinear Flight Control Laws , 1999 .

[8]  Roy Smith,et al.  ROBUST PARAMETRICALLY VARYING ATTITUDE CONTROLLER DESIGNS FOR THE X-33 VEHICLE , 2000 .

[9]  Marc L. Steinberg,et al.  Automated recovery system design with intelligent and adaptive control approaches , 2000 .

[10]  Marc L. Steinberg,et al.  A Comparison of Neural, Fuzzy, Evolutionary, and Adaptive Approaches for Carrier Landing , 2001 .

[11]  Gregg H. Barton,et al.  RADX34: A Future-X Demonstration of Autonomous Robust Abort Technologies on the X-34 , 2001 .

[12]  Greg A. Dukeman,et al.  Atmospheric Ascent Guidance for Rocket-Powered Launch Vehicles , 2005 .

[13]  John D. Schierman,et al.  ADAPTIVE GUIDANCE WITH TRAJECTORY RESHAPING FOR REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES , 2002 .

[14]  David B. Doman,et al.  Footprint Determination for Reusable Launch Vehicles Experiencing Control Effector Failures , 2002 .

[15]  Scott Jackson,et al.  Autonomous Reconfigurable Control Allocation (ARCA) for Reusable Launch Vehicles , 2002 .

[16]  Yuri B. Shtessel,et al.  On-Line Computation of a Local Attainable Moment Set for Reusable Launch Vehicles , 2002 .

[17]  Ping Lu,et al.  Direct Fault Tolerant RLV Attitude Control - A Singular Perturbation Approach , 2002 .

[18]  Ping Lu,et al.  Onboard Generation of Three-Dimensional Constrained Entry Trajectories , 2002 .

[19]  Greg A. Dukeman,et al.  Profile-Following Entry Guidance Using Linear Quadratic Regulator Theory , 2002 .

[20]  Robert E. Jones,et al.  Advanced Guidance and Control Methods for Reusable Launch Vehicles: Test Results , 2002 .

[21]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Generation of Launch Vehicle Abort Trajectories Using a Hybrid Optimization Method , 2002 .

[22]  Amitabh Saraf,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF EVOLVED ACCELERATION GUIDANCE LOGIC FOR ENTRY (EAGLE) , 2002 .

[23]  Yuri B. Shtessel,et al.  Reusable Launch Vehicle Attitude Control Using Time-Varying Sliding Modes , 2002 .

[24]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  A SIX DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM ADAPTIVE FLIGHT CONTROL ARCHITECTURE FOR TRAJECTORY FOLLOWING , 2002 .

[25]  J. Jim Zhu,et al.  Autocommander: A Supervisory Controller for Integrated Guidance and Control for the 2nd Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle , 2002 .

[26]  Ping Lu,et al.  Closed-loop endoatmospheric ascent guidance , 2003 .