Spatially adaptive mixture modeling for analysis of fMRI time series

Within-subject analysis in fMRI essentially addresses two problems, the detection of brain regions eliciting evoked activity and the estimation of the underlying dynamics. In Makni et aL, 2005 and Makni et aL, 2008, a detection-estimation framework has been proposed to tackle these problems jointly, since they are connected to one another. In the Bayesian formalism, detection is achieved by modeling activating and nonactivating voxels through independent mixture models (IMM) within each region while hemodynamic response estimation is performed at a regional scale in a nonparametric way. Instead of IMMs, in this paper we take advantage of spatial mixture models (SMM) for their nonlinear spatial regularizing properties. The proposed method is unsupervised and spatially adaptive in the sense that the amount of spatial correlation is automatically tuned from the data and this setting automatically varies across brain regions. In addition, the level of regularization is specific to each experimental condition since both the signal-to-noise ratio and the activation pattern may vary across stimulus types in a given brain region. These aspects require the precise estimation of multiple partition functions of underlying Ising fields. This is addressed efficiently using first path sampling for a small subset of fields and then using a recently developed fast extrapolation technique for the large remaining set. Simulation results emphasize that detection relying on supervised SMM outperforms its IMM counterpart and that unsupervised spatial mixture models achieve similar results without any hand-tuning of the correlation parameter. On real datasets, the gain is illustrated in a localizer fMRI experiment: brain activations appear more spatially resolved using SMM in comparison with classical general linear model (GLM)-based approaches, while estimating a specific parcel-based HRF shape. Our approach therefore validates the treatment of unsmoothed fMRI data without fixed GLM definition at the subject level and makes also the classical strategy of spatial Gaussian filtering deprecated.

[1]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Wang,et al.  Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[3]  A. Sokal,et al.  Generalization of the Fortuin-Kasteleyn-Swendsen-Wang representation and Monte Carlo algorithm. , 1988, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[4]  Stuart German,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1988 .

[5]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  John W. Woods,et al.  Compound Gauss-Markov random fields for image estimation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[7]  Donald Geman,et al.  Constrained Restoration and the Recovery of Discontinuities , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  C. Geyer,et al.  Constrained Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood for Dependent Data , 1992 .

[9]  Mark Jerrum,et al.  Polynomial-Time Approximation Algorithms for the Ising Model , 1990, SIAM J. Comput..

[10]  Donald Geman,et al.  Nonlinear image recovery with half-quadratic regularization , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  SIMULATING RATIOS OF NORMALIZING CONSTANTS VIA A SIMPLE IDENTITY: A THEORETICAL EXPLORATION , 1996 .

[12]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Fully Bayesian estimation of Gibbs hyperparameters for emission computed tomography data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Comparison of two convolution models for fMRI time series , 1997 .

[15]  N Lange,et al.  Empirical and substantive models, the Bayesian paradigm, and meta‐analysis in functional brain imaging , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[17]  Karl J. Friston Imaging neuroscience: principles or maps? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D. Higdon Auxiliary Variable Methods for Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Applications , 1998 .

[19]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Simulating Normalizing Constants: From Importance Sampling to Bridge Sampling to Path Sampling , 1998 .

[20]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  J. Rajapakse,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:283–300(1998) � Modeling Hemodynamic Response for Analysis of Functional MRI Time-Series , 2022 .

[22]  F Kruggel,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response in single‐trial functional MRI experiments , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Olga Veksler,et al.  Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts , 2001, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[24]  N V Hartvig,et al.  Spatial mixture modeling of fMRI data , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response in fMRI using smooth FIR filters , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Christopher R. Genovese,et al.  A Bayesian Time-Course Model for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2000 .

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  Markus Svensén,et al.  Probabilistic modeling of single-trial fMRI data , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Dissociating neural correlates of cognitive components in mental calculation. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  C Gössl,et al.  Bayesian Spatiotemporal Inference in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Biometrics.

[32]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing , 2001 .

[33]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  A new representation of fMRI data using anatomo-functional constraints , 2001 .

[34]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[35]  P. Green,et al.  Modelling spatially correlated data via mixtures: a Bayesian approach , 2002 .

[36]  Tim Hesterberg,et al.  Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing , 2002, Technometrics.

[37]  R. Turner,et al.  Detecting Latency Differences in Event-Related BOLD Responses: Application to Words versus Nonwords and Initial versus Repeated Face Presentations , 2002, NeuroImage.

[38]  P. Green,et al.  Hidden Markov Models and Disease Mapping , 2002 .

[39]  Matthew J. Beal Variational algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference , 2003 .

[40]  H. Benali,et al.  Robust Bayesian estimation of the hemodynamic response function in event‐related BOLD fMRI using basic physiological information , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Ludwig Fahrmeir,et al.  Assessing brain activity through spatial bayesian variable selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[42]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Unsupervised robust nonparametric estimation of the hemodynamic response function for any fMRI experiment , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  Florence Forbes,et al.  Hidden Markov Random Field Model Selection Criteria Based on Mean Field-Like Approximations , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[44]  G. Rees Statistical Parametric Mapping , 2004, Practical Neurology.

[45]  Naoki Miura,et al.  A state-space model of the hemodynamic approach: nonlinear filtering of BOLD signals , 2004, NeuroImage.

[46]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  An experimental comparison of min-cut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[47]  Tohru Ozaki,et al.  fMRI activation maps based on the NN-ARx model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[48]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Fully Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of FMRI data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[50]  R. Buxton,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[51]  Habib Benali,et al.  Estimation of the hemodynamic response in event-related functional MRI: Bayesian networks as a framework for efficient Bayesian modeling and inference , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[52]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes , 2004, NeuroImage.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bilinear dynamical systems , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Mixture models with adaptive spatial regularization for segmentation with an application to FMRI data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[55]  Polina Golland,et al.  From Spatial Regularization to Anatomical Priors in fMRI Analysis , 2005, IPMI.

[56]  Adrian Barbu,et al.  Generalizing Swendsen-Wang to sampling arbitrary posterior probabilities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[57]  J B Poline,et al.  Joint detection-estimation of brain activity in functional MRI: a Multichannel Deconvolution solution , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[58]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian fMRI time series analysis with spatial priors , 2005, NeuroImage.

[59]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: Multi‐subject parcellation of fMRI datasets , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[60]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Variational bayes inference of spatial mixture models for segmentation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[61]  Benjamin Thyreau,et al.  Anatomo-Functional Description of the Brain : A Probabilistic Approach , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[62]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neuronal activity in monkey visual area V1 , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  Hichem Snoussi,et al.  Bayesian blind separation of generalized hyperbolic processes in noisy and underdeterminate mixtures , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[64]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  EEG-fMRI fusion of non-triggered data using Kalman filtering , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[65]  M. Smith,et al.  Estimation of Binary Markov Random Fields Using Markov chain Monte Carlo , 2006 .

[66]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing hemodynamic models with DCM , 2007, NeuroImage.

[67]  Jérôme Idier,et al.  Spatial Mixture Modelling for the Joint Detection-Estimation of Brain Activity in fMRI , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[68]  Patrizia Baraldi,et al.  An ARX model-based approach to trial by trial identification of fMRI-BOLD responses , 2007, NeuroImage.

[69]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Spatial Bayesian Variable Selection With Application to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2007 .

[70]  William D. Penny,et al.  Bayesian fMRI data analysis with sparse spatial basis function priors , 2007, NeuroImage.

[71]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  Generalizing Swendsen–Wang for Image Analysis , 2007, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics.

[72]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Diffusion-based spatial priors for functional magnetic resonance images , 2008, NeuroImage.

[73]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian deconvolution fMRI data using bilinear dynamical systems , 2008, NeuroImage.

[74]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  A fully Bayesian approach to the parcel-based detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[75]  Iven M. Y. Mareels,et al.  Nonlinear estimation of the BOLD signal , 2008, NeuroImage.

[76]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Probabilistic Anatomo-Functional Parcellation of the Cortex: How Many Regions? , 2008, MICCAI.

[77]  Thomas Veit,et al.  Rééchantillonnage de l'échelle dans les algorithmes MCMC pour les problèmes inverses bilinéaires , 2008 .

[78]  Alexis Roche,et al.  Improved fMRI group studies based on spatially varying non-parametric BOLD signal modeling , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[79]  Jérôme Idier,et al.  Unsupervised Bayesian 3D reconstruction for non-destructive evaluation using gammagraphy , 2008, 2008 16th European Signal Processing Conference.

[80]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of parcellation in the joint detection-estimation of brain activity in fMRI , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[81]  Laurent Risser,et al.  Robust Extrapolation Scheme for Fast Estimation of 3D Ising Field Partition Functions: Application to Within-Subject fMRI Data Analysis , 2009, MICCAI.

[82]  Laurent Risser,et al.  Multivariate Spatial Gaussian Mixture Modeling for statistical clustering of hemodynamic parameters in functional MRI , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[83]  Jérôme Idier,et al.  Modelling the neurovascular habituation effect on fMRI time series , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[84]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Exploratory fMRI analysis without spatial normalization , 2010 .